[Bug 13683] Internal Laptopdisplay blurrys to white screen after enabling modesetting on Radeon X700 Mobility

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13683 --- Comment #29 from Alex Deucher 2009-11-30 07:28:09 --- Created an attachment (id=23974) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23974) grab misc mode info for lvds Does this patch help? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.k

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms/atom: pull misc mode info for lvds from bios tables

2009-11-29 Thread Alex Deucher
>From 0d49d381d6749dc3013527b369c83ef31852ce4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Deucher Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:40:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/kms/atom: pull misc mode info for lvds from bios tables sync polarity, etc. This will likely fix LVDS problems on some laptops. Signed-off

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread vehemens
On Sunday 29 November 2009 19:51:55 Robert Noland wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 15:36 -0800, vehemens wrote: > > I believe that moving away from the current model makes it more > > difficult > > to "... spread the burden ...", hence my objections. If you want to > > call > > that ranting or compl

[Bug 25354] Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-9200)

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 --- Comment #5 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 20:13:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > gpu_draw.c:1298 line contains following call: > glMatrixMode(GL_TEXTURE); The current SVN version of the file gpu_draw.c is available at https://svn.bl

[Bug 25354] Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-9200)

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 --- Comment #4 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 20:04:40 PST --- Here is a backtrace obtained by Sami Pelkonen on T41 laptop with ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 (M9) Lf (AGP). Compiz disabled and glxgears also works. Compiled Blender SVN version (241

[Bug 25354] Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-9200)

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 --- Comment #3 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 20:00:13 PST --- Created an attachment (id=31570) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31570) glxinfo.txt -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai

[Bug 25354] Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-9200)

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 --- Comment #2 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 19:59:46 PST --- Created an attachment (id=31569) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31569) lspci -vvnn -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai

[Bug 25354] Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-9200)

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 --- Comment #1 from Geir Ove Myhr 2009-11-29 19:59:17 PST --- Created an attachment (id=31568) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31568) Xorg.0.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug 25354] New: Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000-9200)

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 Summary: Blender crashes on startup on Radeon 7500 (and 9000- 9200) Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Sev

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Robert Noland
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 15:36 -0800, vehemens wrote: > I believe that moving away from the current model makes it more > difficult > to "... spread the burden ...", hence my objections. If you want to > call > that ranting or complaining, so be it. We no longer get to share the burden with the mu

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM, vehemens wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:36:51 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: >> On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote: >> > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: >> > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote: >> > > >

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:03:51PM -0800, vehemens wrote: > You missing the point as is rnoland. Just because the linux DRM developers > stopped using a centralized repository, didn't mean FreeBSD shouldn't as the > intial integration work would be still shared reducing the burden on any one >

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread vehemens
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:36:51 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote: > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > Your missing the point of usin

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Sunday 29 November 2009 18:54:31 vehemens wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > Your missing the point of using a development structure which supports > > > collobration. > > > > [snip

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread vehemens
On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:23:44 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote: > > [snip] > > > Your missing the point of using a development structure which supports > > collobration. > > [snip] > > > The difference is that you are the only one doing the work now

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Sunday 29 November 2009 14:16:13 vehemens wrote: [snip] > Your missing the point of using a development structure which supports > collobration. [snip] > The difference is that you are the only one doing the work now. [snip] > Again, your missing the point of using a development structure

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread vehemens
On Sunday 29 November 2009 10:39:34 Maarten Maathuis wrote: > I enjoy playing the devils advocate occasionally, so take this with a > grain of salt. > > My understanding is that there are roughly 3 bsd kernels that support > drm userspace interface(free*, open* and netbsd?), each has 1 or 2 > maint

[Bug 25346] kwin extraneous transparent boxes

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25346 --- Comment #1 from Aidan Marks 2009-11-29 13:09:28 PST --- Created an attachment (id=31557) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31557) kwin_extraneous_example2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cg

[Bug 25346] New: kwin extraneous transparent boxes

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25346 Summary: kwin extraneous transparent boxes Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Componen

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Maarten Maathuis
I enjoy playing the devils advocate occasionally, so take this with a grain of salt. My understanding is that there are roughly 3 bsd kernels that support drm userspace interface(free*, open* and netbsd?), each has 1 or 2 maintainers. For better or worse the linux guys/girls have gone their own wa

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread vehemens
On Sunday 29 November 2009 07:07:41 Robert Noland wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:40 -0800, vehemens wrote: > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:38 -0800, vehemens wrote: > > > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 10:41:39 Robert Noland wrote: >

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread vehemens
On Sunday 29 November 2009 00:31:17 Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:40:55PM -0800, vehemens wrote: > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote: > > > Because unpublished work doesn't exist That goes for the work that > > > I've done that isn't yet publ

[Bug 24611] KMS: Plugging in only S-video locks up machine

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611 Pierre Ossman changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31547|0 |1 is obsolete|

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:40 -0800, vehemens wrote: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:38 -0800, vehemens wrote: > > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 10:41:39 Robert Noland wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:23 -0800, vehemens wrote: > > > >

[Bug 24611] KMS: Plugging in only S-video locks up machine

2009-11-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611 --- Comment #14 from Pierre Ossman 2009-11-29 03:26:03 PST --- Created an attachment (id=31547) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=31547) radeon-crtc-off.patch More testing has narrowed it down to the requirement that it's

Re: [Patch VIA UniChrome DRM][2/3 Ver2] Add interfaces for communication with V4L and DDMPEG

2009-11-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
brucech...@via.com.tw wrote: > Hello Sirs: > This patch is to add the interface to communicate with V4L and DDMPEG. > > Signed-off-by Bruce C. Chang > > diff -ruN old/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dma.c new/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dma.c > --- old/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dma.c 2009-10-22 10:42:10.00

Re: [patch 1/5] drm/via: add pci id for VIA VX800 chipset

2009-11-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
Dave Airlie wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:41 AM, wrote: > >> From: Thomas Schlichter >> >> The VIA DRM module is able to accelerate 2D video on the VX800 chipset, >> thus add the corresponding PCI ID. Accelerated 3D video is not >> implemented. >> >> The modified VIA DRM module was test

Re: [Patch VIA UniChrome DRM][1/3 Ver2] Add support for ACPI suspend/resume.

2009-11-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
brucech...@via.com.tw wrote: > Hello Sirs: > This patch is to add the support of ACPI suspend/resume. Some information > locating in video memory > need to be saved for 3D function. The mesa driver source has been release on > VIA Linux portal > (http://linux.via.com.tw/support/beginDownload

Re: [Patch VIA UniChrome DRM][3/3 Ver2] Fix video hang issue caused by verification function

2009-11-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
brucech...@via.com.tw wrote: > Hello Sirs: > This patch is to solve the video hang issue caused by verification > function. These 3 patches has been verified in (1) CX700M platform (2) CLE266 > platform (3) K8M800 platform (4) CN400 platform with UniChrome/OpenChrome > driver except few of t

Re: [patch] fix small memory leak in ttm_memory.c

2009-11-29 Thread Thomas Hellström
Dan Carpenter wrote: > I moved the allocation until after the check for (si->totalhigh == 0). > > regards, > dan carpenter > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > --- orig/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_memory.c 2009-11-28 07:05:54.0 > +0200 > +++ devel/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_memory.c2009-

Re: RFC: libdrm repo

2009-11-29 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:40:55PM -0800, vehemens wrote: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 16:21:58 Robert Noland wrote: > > Because unpublished work doesn't exist That goes for the work that > > I've done that isn't yet published as well. Until it is in the hands of > > someone besides you