On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Randy just informed me that the patch limits are bigger now, so here are the
> actual patches.
>
> This patch allows for proper console unregistration via the VT layer, and
> updates the FB layer to use it. This makes debugging new console
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:36 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 08:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > The current code does its best to figure out what modes are available
> > > and tries to pick a good one for each display
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Randy just informed me that the patch limits are bigger now, so here are the
> actual patches.
>
> This patch allows for proper console unregistration via the VT layer, and
> updates the FB layer to use it. This makes debugging new console
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 22:07 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>> Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>> Has anyone any objections to me removing the MTRR code from the DRM.
>>>
>>> It doesn't have the intimate knowledge needed to properly con
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> Has anyone any objections to me removing the MTRR code from the DRM.
>
> It doesn't have the intimate knowledge needed to properly configure
> MTRR's and fails in many cases.
>
> There are two cases currently, one for the framebuffer and a second for
> the entire AGP space
Jon Smirl wrote:
On 8/7/05, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I agree that something like the above is acceptable, exept that we need
an extra field for offset and another if indexed color or not. So
something like:
A:2/0/R:10/2/G:10/12/B:10/22//I
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I agree that something like the above is acceptable, exept that we need
an extra field for offset and another if indexed color or not. So
something like:
A:2/0/R:10/2/G:10/12/B:10/22//I
This is getting more cryptic by the minute.
Can't we have a simple field: value
Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Smirl wrote:
I'm trying to work out a syntax for the sysfs attribute that will
control the config. My first idea is to use a alpha/red/blue/green
syntax. When red is set and blue/green are missing index mode is set.
When gree
Jon Smirl wrote:
I'm trying to work out a syntax for the sysfs attribute that will
control the config. My first idea is to use a alpha/red/blue/green
syntax. When red is set and blue/green are missing index mode is set.
When green is set and red/blue are missing gray scale is set.
No, if r.offs
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 21:36, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrj??wrote:
> > > If radeonfb will allocate the buffer for the second head from the top
> > > of the memory users would basically h
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 23:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (With new savagefb X server starts, but screen is very messed, moving mouse
> cursor makes things even worse. X is useless with my Twister [8d02] and
> savagefb.)
Try
Option "UseBIOS" "false"
Tony
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 00:28, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Doesn't the base platform need to be designed to also treat individual
> heads as resources?
>
> fbdev only sets the mode on a single head. My cards have more that one
> head. When I tried adding mode setting to DRM so that I could handle
> my
On Saturday 11 September 2004 13:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
> The other thing I think some people are confusing is 2.4 fbdev and 2.6...
> there is no console support in 2.6 fbdev drivers, it is all in the fbcon
> stuff, so the fbdev drivers are only doing 2d mode setting and monitor
> detection, some p
13 matches
Mail list logo
