Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2009 10:27:49 +0100
> Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>
>> Why are you comparing booleans to TRUE and worse then negating the
>> result?
>>
>> if( !noWait )
>>
>>
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Why are you comparing booleans to TRUE and worse then negating the result?
if( !noWait )
Is clearer.
- waitForVideoSync (s);
+ if (!(noWait == TRUE))
+ waitForVideoSync (s);
Barry
-
I saw this and thought it was wrong.
int
i915_seqno_passed(uint32_t seq1, uint32_t seq2)
{
return (int32_t)(seq1 - seq2) >= 0;
After a bit of thinking I realized that this is doing modulas arithmetic to
deal with the seqno wrapping around. Given its not obvious at first glance
you might
Alex Deucher wrote:
On 7/27/05, Barry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What controlled version of the DRI sources with VIA support do you
recommend I use
with kernel 2.6.11 on an FC4 distribution?
Barry
I think you'll have to use xorg/mesa cvs for DRI su
What controlled version of the DRI sources with VIA support do you
recommend I use
with kernel 2.6.11 on an FC4 distribution?
Barry
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Ro
I pulled the CVS version of DRI and found that it does not compile
because the kernel version
checks against 2.6.11 all need to be 2.6.10. For example:
CC [M] /home/bscott/wc/cvs/dri/drm/linux-core/drm_agpsupport.o
/home/bscott/wc/cvs/dri/drm/linux-core/drm_agpsupport.c: In function
‘drm_agp_ac
004 11:38
> To: Barry Scott
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Where is the source for DRM 1.5?
>
>
>
> > Why 1.5, because the CLE266 XvMC driver needs that
> > version.
> >
> > I'm looking for a stable version of the 1.5 interface to use with
&g
e you suggest it I cannot use a 2.6 kernel.
Barry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vladimir
> Dergachev
> Sent: 28 September 2004 01:59
> To: Barry Scott
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Where is the source for
