Re: [Dri-devel] Default AGP mode

2002-06-13 Thread David S. Miller
From: Mike A. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 02:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Ben LaHaise suggested tonigth to me on IRC that perhaps we could read the AGP mode from the BIOS and set that by default, and also keep blacklist/whitelists in the drivers/whatever to deal with

Re: [Dri-devel] Default AGP mode

2002-06-12 Thread David S. Miller
From: Mike A. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:35:15 -0400 (EDT) It would appear that AGP mode 1x is used by default always unless the AGPmode option is specified in the config file. (Correct me if I'm not completely correct with that). I'm wondering if

Re: [Dri-devel] Default AGP mode

2002-06-12 Thread David S. Miller
From: Jeff Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 21:57:31 -0500 Actually, its most safe to default to AGP mode 1x. If we aren't switching modes correctly there is a bug in that agp driver, and I'd like to know about it. Try to enable 4X in BIOS of SiS Athlon

Re: [Dri-devel] Default AGP mode

2002-06-12 Thread David S. Miller
From: Mike A. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 21:39:23 -0400 (EDT) Basically, someone has asked for me to default AGPMode to 4 in our config file, which I thought was absolutely crazy. The claim is that AGP defaulted to 1x, but changing it to 4x sped things

Re: [Dri-devel] Oh boy...

2002-05-30 Thread David S. Miller
From: Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:59:23 +0100 I haven't proven whether these are all restore-context changes, or if some additional bogus statechanges are emitted later on. Either way, it's easy to see room for improvement... In viewperf these

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 7500 lockup

2002-05-24 Thread David S. Miller
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 13:09:18 -0700 (PDT) ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas --

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: OpenGL and the LinuxThreads pthread_descrstructure

2002-05-21 Thread David S. Miller
, using a bleeding-edge version of GCC, but you haven't answered my question. Not bleeding edge. Many versions of the compiler do this for you. Even if this were not the case, stupid compilation tools are not an excuse to put changes into the C library. That is a fact. Franks a lot, David S

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: OpenGL and the LinuxThreads pthread_descrstructure

2002-05-17 Thread David S. Miller
the time. Franks a lot, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Dri-devel] Re: FFB Driver in x86 Build

2002-04-03 Thread David S. Miller
From: Jens Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 20:19:31 -0700 Perhaps, you'd be interested in moving your FFB DRM kernel module upstream to the DRI repository. Does the DRI repository even build kernel modules on non-x86 platforms correctly? Ie. does it add all the

Re: [Dri-devel] Unreal

2002-02-20 Thread David S. Miller
From: Gareth Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:15:54 -0800 Keith Whitwell wrote: You do see the partial frames, it seems. The eye seems to do a reasonable job of integrating it all, providing you with a low-latency view of the game world. Hardcore

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon VE? (Carl Busjahn)

2001-10-10 Thread David S. Miller
, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Re: Radeon 8500, what's the plan?

2001-10-02 Thread David S. Miller
a lot, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Re: Radeon 8500, what's the plan?

2001-10-02 Thread David S. Miller
vendor. So for example, I've installed vanilla Loki Quake3 from the CD on everything from a Red Hat 6.2 7.1 with no problems. All of the point releases from ID installed fine as well. Franks a lot, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.0.0 but version 1.1.x is needed

2001-06-14 Thread David S. Miller
XFree86-4.1.x not from the current 2.4.x kernel as these two trees are not synchronized. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa-3.5-branch: The SPARC stuff

2001-06-05 Thread David S. Miller
. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel