Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org
This patch has a bunch of whitespace damage at least in my inbox and
also
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse jcro...@codeaurora.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |4 -
drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile|2
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 27 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
Following is a patch to allow platform devices on platforms without PCI
to register and operate as fully fledged DRM devices. I have been using
this code for some time now and I'm convinced that the model works, but
I'm posting this to get some constructive criticism on ways to improve
the
I have finally been successful at getting X 4.1.0 and DRI working on my ATI
rage Mobilty 128 M3. It would appear that the current ATI DRM module being
distributed in 2.4.5-ac13+ (or maybe even older) is not working as well as it
should for 2D drawing (classic flash problems).
I rebuilt my
1) OK, I am still confused. Can someone please tell me is the DRI support
working for the above-mentioned video card or not?
I have had 2D flicker issues with the standard 4.1.0 binary build from the
XFree86 folks (see previous messages). However, I have heard from several
people who have
On Thursday 21 June 2001 14:55, Michel Dänzer mentioned:
Jordan Crouse wrote:
I am running Linux 2.4.5-ac16 and XFree86 4.1.0 with an ATI Rage Mobility
LF Rev 2 chipset (Renderer string: Mesa DRI Rage 128 20010405 M3 AGP 2x
x86/MMX/SSE) and I am getting the the old familiar black flicker
