Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse
>
> This patch has a bunch of whitespace damage at least in my inbox and
> also in pa
Following is a patch to allow platform devices on platforms without PCI
to register and operate as fully fledged DRM devices. I have been using
this code for some time now and I'm convinced that the model works, but
I'm posting this to get some constructive criticism on ways to improve
the pat
Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |4 -
drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile|2
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bufs.c | 27 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 38
I have finally been successful at getting X 4.1.0 and DRI working on my ATI
rage Mobilty 128 M3. It would appear that the current ATI DRM module being
distributed in 2.4.5-ac13+ (or maybe even older) is not working as well as it
should for 2D drawing (classic flash problems).
I rebuilt my
> 1) OK, I am still confused. Can someone please tell me is the DRI support
> working for the above-mentioned video card or not?
I have had 2D flicker issues with the standard 4.1.0 binary build from the
XFree86 folks (see previous messages). However, I have heard from several
people who have
On Thursday 21 June 2001 14:55, Michel Dänzer mentioned:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > I am running Linux 2.4.5-ac16 and XFree86 4.1.0 with an ATI Rage Mobility
> > LF Rev 2 chipset (Renderer string: Mesa DRI Rage 128 20010405 M3 AGP 2x
> > x86/MMX/SSE) and I am getting the th
All -
I am running Linux 2.4.5-ac16 and XFree86 4.1.0 with an ATI Rage Mobility LF
Rev 2 chipset (Renderer string: Mesa DRI Rage 128 20010405 M3 AGP 2x
x86/MMX/SSE) and I am getting the the old familiar "black flicker" problem.
Unfortunately, the old familar Option "UseCCEFor2D" "true" tric
