Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Keith Whitwell wrote:
[SNIP]
To XFree86? Well, that's another question.
That sounds more negative than I wanted. Basically, after the drivers are
living in Mesa cvs, we could well end up just submitting patches to XFree86
for the rest - but tha
Keith Whitwell wrote:
The patch does have a few issues. Firstly it doesn't apply cleanly to
the current trunk so there'll be a bit of work wiggling it in.
[SNIP]
I noticed that, but I also noticed something else. It seems that trunk
has some regressions [or lack of updating, as well the case
Keith Whitwell wrote:
[SNIP]
Boy, this looks interesting. Unfortunately I'm about to leave on a
week's holidays so I won't be able to properly read the patch or comment
until I get back. I'm broadly in favour of applying this but would love
to participate in the discussions that will surround
Dave Jones wrote:
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE <= KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,2)
> #define down_write down
> #define up_write up
#if can go, like it did in other parts of the patch.
What will replace it? If you intend to keep the two
projects in sync and easy to update, I'm afraid that it will
call for
