On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:01:26PM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> You can argue most of these points both ways, but I've heard all of them
> in one form or another. In most cases it simply comes down to the fact
> that if it doesn't make them money they don't want to do it, and there's
> no way to
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:59:50PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> Temporary page is at: http://dri.sourceforge.net/status2.phtml
Commenting on status.html:
Doesn't the STB/3dfx velocity series use the NVIDIA riva chipset?
I haven't seen support for the RIVA chipset (I've got an STB velocity,
don't
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:47:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are
> > already available[0], still a little rough. (I need to generate the
> > module source
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a G450 card at work.
> > Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
> > which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
> Ouc
Hi,
I have a G450 card at work.
Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
Now I have installed the stuff, and surprise surprise, it does want a
new kernel module... 3.0.x, and not 2.0.0.
Major trouble, since there is a rule
