Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > I suppose I'm basing my assumptions on sarea usage that is not there right
> > now (a private sarea per context system rather than the temporary copies
> > which we have now), and assuming a full featured t&l card will have
> > somewhere around 4-16k of possible state.
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 22:39, jhartmann wrote:
> > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Jeff, Others,
> > >
> > > I've been reviewing the work in the 3.5 branch for backwards
> > > compatibility and to me it looks like we can do
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jeff, Others,
>
> I've been reviewing the work in the 3.5 branch for backwards compatibility
> and to me it looks like we can do it with a lot less effort. Here's what I'm
> proposing, in one simple sentence:
>
> Instigate a rule where any released ioctl will alwa
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > Can I remove irq from the current branch? I have no option in BIOS that
> > will
> > disable IRQ for video, but If I had I suppose that DRM would manage with
> > that. Can I simulate "no irq available"?
>
> Turning off the irq in hardware won't help you, you need to
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> TAU wrote:
> >
> > Can you direct me on what should I do to get a cvs version working:
> > Where cvs is
> > what X11 parts should I compile and where to install
> > should I compile anything except i810 kmod for the kernel?
> > I can't find any ready RPMs for Mesa 3.5, sho
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michael Zayats wrote:
> >
> > The configuration is following:
> >
> > i810 + 2.4.3 + agpgart + 4.1.0 + kmod from 4.1.0
> >
> > I have the following problem:
> >
> > when drm loads (from /var/log/XFree86.0.log) it reports that
> > it can't register IRQ handler due to anothe
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jeff, Rik, Others,
>
> Can you please post a description of what the backwards compatibility kernel
> code changes are, how they work, what developers are expected to do to keep
> them working?
>
Here is a quick rundown of how the infrastructure works:
During Xserver star
