Hi,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:37:23PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Would anyone have objections if these lists moved to freedesktop.org?
> The recent thread with Linus about the drm pull request highlights the
> post lag and non-subscriber aspect of the current lists,
Err, how would moving the
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:33:49AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> [...] gears sometimes _is_ a good benchmark.
Be careful -- someone might quote you out of context ;-)
-antrik-
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the r
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:28:37PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Consider a case where user space is stalled due to excessive load, and
> let's think about usability. Much of usability comes from feedback
> given to a user.
>
> If cursor updates are done completely inside the kernel, the mo
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:55:50PM -0200, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> Under KMS, we can build a feature to update the cursor directly to
> screen without the continuous intervention of the userspace
> application (X server, wayland, etc). It's a fastpath for DRM based
> cursors obtained by short-
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:52:41AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sunday, September 2, 2007 6:21 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As for EDID, I totally agree that this can be done in user space
> > just fine. What I'm saying is that no central daemon is required for
> > that. Handling this d
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:08:57AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:50:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Graphics chips are complicated, but the bulk of the complexity is
> > not in modesetting. Do you really think that modesetting (and other
> > graphics hardw
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:31:10AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, August 23, 2007 6:44:49 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am *not* opposed to a scheme where userspace has to provide
> > information how to set up a desired mode. (Although I'm not conviced
> > it's really necessary
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 09:36:32PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sunday, August 12, 2007 8:50:12 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I fail to understand why you want to put the manager in a daemon,
> > instead of just letting the kernel do the management, like it does
> > for all other hardwar
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:27:43PM +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote:
> On Aug 12, 07 17:50:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I fail to understand why you want to put the manager in a daemon,
> > instead of just letting the kernel do the management, like it does
> > for all other hardware. Why
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:31:01PM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> There should be master (possibly one for each card) which be the only
> one being able to do this call:
> DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC - set CRTC parameters
[...]
> master (big boss)
> - X server (got its framebuffer)
> - X app
10 matches
Mail list logo
