On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 22:34, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 00:12, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> >>+ if (dev_priv->is_r200)
> >>+ filename="r200_cp_microcode";
> >>+ else
> >>+ filename="radeon_cp_microcode";
> >
>
Michel DÃnzer wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 00:12, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
This is the most up-to-date version. Something very similar to this
version is going into Debian's Linux kernel packages. (Herbert Xu claims
to have removed the memcpy's in *_firmware_loader.c, though I don't
know exactly
Dave Airlie wrote:
although I'm sure debian are correct, I don't think this change is
appropriate for a stable release, it adds extra user space requirements..
Well, for an unstable release then. (2.7?) :-) Since I'm submitting
this up-upstream, and I don't particularly expect a major DRM merge
although I'm sure debian are correct, I don't think this change is
appropriate for a stable release, it adds extra user space requirements..
so I won't be applying it in its current form, I might try firmware
loading and fall back to using the in-built microcode, it won't satisfy
Debian but that's
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 00:12, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This is the most up-to-date version. Something very similar to this
> version is going into Debian's Linux kernel packages. (Herbert Xu claims
> to have removed the memcpy's in *_firmware_loader.c, though I don't
> know exactly how it did it.
