Russ,
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:02:10AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
related note: I was setting up a mach64 for one of my friends, and X
dying with a SIGILL. It looks like the snapshots are being compiled with
686 optimizations (this was a k6)
I've checked the specs of the gcc which is building th
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:21:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:37:05AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:19:31 +0100, Frank Steiner wrote:
> [...]
> >>The same with my Radeon 8500. It gets signal 11 after loading the pcidata
> >>module. I install
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:37:05AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:19:31 +0100, Frank Steiner wrote:
[...]
The same with my Radeon 8500. It gets signal 11 after loading the pcidata
module. I installed everything from the latest snapshot.
Anything I can do, any output I ca
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:42:20 +, José Fonseca wrote:
> Alan,
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:37:05AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> [...]
> >Jose,
> >
> >Snapshots won't work without you bundling the libpcidata.a. The functions
> >calls made inside the Xserver to the pcidata module changed.
Alan,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:37:05AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
[...]
Jose,
Snapshots won't work without you bundling the libpcidata.a. The functions
calls made inside the Xserver to the pcidata module changed.
Alan.
Should the pcidata module be made available in the extras package or i
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:19:31 +0100, Frank Steiner wrote:
> "Sergey V. Udaltsov" wrote:
>
> > Also, X server from ../extras just does not work. It break with signal
> > 11.:( Same thing happens after installing dri drivers - this just makes
> > no difference.
>
> The same with my Radeon 8500.
"Sergey V. Udaltsov" wrote:
> Also, X server from ../extras just does not work. It break with signal
> 11.:( Same thing happens after installing dri drivers - this just makes
> no difference.
The same with my Radeon 8500. It gets signal 11 after loading the pcidata
module. I installed everything
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 08:38, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2002-11-01 at 16:30, Russ Dill wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 08:15, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:02:10AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> > > > related note: I was setting up a mach64 for one of my friends, and X
> >
On Fre, 2002-11-01 at 16:30, Russ Dill wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 08:15, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:02:10AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> > > related note: I was setting up a mach64 for one of my friends, and X
> > > dying with a SIGILL. It looks like the snapshots are bei
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 08:15, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:02:10AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> > related note: I was setting up a mach64 for one of my friends, and X
> > dying with a SIGILL. It looks like the snapshots are being compiled with
> > 686 optimizations (this was a k6)
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:02:10AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> related note: I was setting up a mach64 for one of my friends, and X
> dying with a SIGILL. It looks like the snapshots are being compiled with
> 686 optimizations (this was a k6)
If you've ended up using the XFree86 4.2.99.2 Xserver wit
related note: I was setting up a mach64 for one of my friends, and X
dying with a SIGILL. It looks like the snapshots are being compiled with
686 optimizations (this was a k6)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:50:38PM +, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
I'll have to fix this, probably by using a seperate install.sh for
mach64, or by specifing the necessary XFree86 version on the package
describing file.
Great. But why X server from 2.99.1 is not compatible with mach64?? I
thou
> I'll have to fix this, probably by using a seperate install.sh for
> mach64, or by specifing the necessary XFree86 version on the package
> describing file.
Great. But why X server from 2.99.1 is not compatible with mach64?? I
though I should not break things at least. Why does it?
Anyway, I'l
Sergey,
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:01:20PM +, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
Hi all
They are only bleeding-edge snapshots because the DRI cvs HEAD no longer
can produce binary compatible snapshots. All new snapshots require to
download and install XFree86-4.2.99.2 server from
http://dri.sourcefo
Hi all
> They are only bleeding-edge snapshots because the DRI cvs HEAD no longer
> can produce binary compatible snapshots. All new snapshots require to
> download and install XFree86-4.2.99.2 server from
> http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/extras/ . The 'install.sh' script
> attempts to deter
The nightly build of snapshots has been resumed. They can be found on
http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ .
They are only bleeding-edge snapshots because the DRI cvs HEAD no longer
can produce binary compatible snapshots. All new snapshots require to
download and install XFree86-4.
17 matches
Mail list logo
