Re: [Dri-devel] MGA Driver Performance

2001-05-28 Thread Karl Lessard
Hi Ben! Yeap, as I said, a lot of work is needed to make the MGA driver really faster, I am too in the phase of discovering how all this stuff works, so it is not relly easy for me to tell you everything that needs to be done in it. About the AGP texturing, a lot of work has been by ralf wil

Re: [Dri-devel] MGA Driver Performance

2001-05-25 Thread Ben Smith
I'm really sorry about that. I was going to cancel and I(obviously) wasn't paying enough attention. I was going to cancel because I thought I would look at the source some before saying anything, but since I've inadvertently delurked I may as well say it anyway. I have a matrox G400. I have

Re: [Dri-devel] MGA Driver Performance

2001-05-25 Thread Ben Smith
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Brian Paul wrote: > > We haven't done any real work on the MGA driver in a long time. > Nobody's funding us to do so. > > You may get a bit of a performance improvement when we move > to Mesa 3.5-based driver. (still underway) > > -Brian > > __

Re: [Dri-devel] MGA Driver Performance

2001-05-23 Thread Brian Paul
John Tobin wrote: > > I have been monitoring the DRI since it first began and I have just > > one question regarding the MGA driver. > > I was wondering if you consider it to be functioning at the highest > performance that you can get out of it? > > I ask this because I have been doing benchm

[Dri-devel] MGA Driver Performance

2001-05-22 Thread John Tobin
I have been monitoring the DRI since it first began and I have just one question regarding the MGA driver. I was wondering if you consider it to be functioning at the highest performance that you can get out of it? I ask this because I have been doing benchmarking and comparison between Wi