I'm using gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010407), and I should have packages
compiled with a current CVS tomorrow, going to sleep now.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:26:01PM +0200, Ard van Breemen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:47:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:47:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are
> > already available[0], still a little rough. (I need to generate the
> > module source
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:08:20PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a G450 card at work.
> > Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
> > which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
> Ouc
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:13:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a G450 card at work.
> Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
> which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
Ouch, you're going to be annoyed that you missed this, but .debs are
alre
Hi,
I have a G450 card at work.
Currently I am trying to build the latest drivers into a deb package,
which painfully (took me a week :() succeeded.
Now I have installed the stuff, and surprise surprise, it does want a
new kernel module... 3.0.x, and not 2.0.0.
Major trouble, since there is a rule
