Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-25 Thread Manuel Teira
El Mar 25 Sep 2001 07:27, escribiste: On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Manuel Teira wrote: Perhaps we should work with the latest DRI trunk. Do you think it worth the effort? It seems that most of the changes I noticed have been in the drivers for the newer cards, but I haven't really looked at it

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-23 Thread Manuel Teira
El Dom 23 Sep 2001 04:50, escribiste: According to the register ref. (p.4-26), GB means BGA package, AGP: both 1x and 2x). I have an LT Pro, which has LB in the device ID. This is in the CFG_CHIP_TYPE in CONFIG_CHIP_ID. There's also a class, foundry ID, and major/minor numbers in

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Andreas Karrenbauer
Hi guys! I've had lot of other things to do in the past weeks so I couldn't work on mach64. I've still problems to compile the trunk with Manuel's patches. I haven't had time to track this down, so I decided to post my changes of mach64_dma.c which I have made in my copy of the

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Manuel Teira
El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 14:54, escribiste: Hi guys! I've had lot of other things to do in the past weeks so I couldn't work on mach64. I've still problems to compile the trunk with Manuel's patches. I haven't had time to track this down, so I decided to post my changes of mach64_dma.c which I

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Andreas Karrenbauer
Manuel Teira wrote: It's nice to hear about you again. I'll test the changes you've made on my machine ASAP. BTW, I've take a fast look about the way you are allocating the memory for the test: struct pci_pool *pool; void *cpu_addr_table, *cpu_addr_data; void *cpu_addr_table,

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Manuel Teira
El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 17:03, escribiste: Manuel Teira wrote: have a look at kernel-source-dir/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt OK. Thanks for the help. there's the explaination about this API. I think we should use this if anybody hasn't any objections. pci_pool_create is specified: pool =

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Manuel Teira
El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 18:12, escribiste: Manuel Teira wrote: Then, I closed my eyes and fired 'gears'. Well, it didn't lock my machine, the gears window only contained garbage, but the program was running, and saying: 1786 frames in 5.002 seconds = 357.057 FPS 1736 frames in 5 seconds =

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread David Bronaugh
Hi, This is re Andreas Karrenbauer's prob.. perhaps it's a bit off topic, but it might help... Have you tried logging in via SSH and killing off and starting X via that? I have had a fair degree of success restoring graphics mode that way (though text mode stays hosed). As I said, I don't know

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Manuel Teira
El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 19:08, escribiste: Manuel Teira wrote: El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 18:30, escribiste: You can pass an argument to isosurf to tell it to render only 100 triangles (isosurf -100) - another good option, and you can get it to render more by moving with the arrow keys.

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Leif Delgass
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Manuel Teira wrote: El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 19:08, escribiste: Manuel Teira wrote: El Sáb 22 Sep 2001 18:30, escribiste: You can pass an argument to isosurf to tell it to render only 100 triangles (isosurf -100) - another good option, and you can get it to

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 developers

2001-09-22 Thread Carl Busjahn
Hi all, I've looked at the documentation, and it's odd, it seems like nobody is mentioning the Mach64 GB. It might be this is simply named wrong in my bios, and it seems to run the same as other cards. Here's my PCI entry: pci bus 0x1 cardnum 0x00 function 0x: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4742