This is a patch to call the context handles destructors and free the
context bitmap entries when a process does not destroy its contexts
before it exits. It saves context handles in a linked list in the
drm_device struct. I decided to use per device list instead of a per
file descriptor list f
Am Freitag, 20. Februar 2004 08:39 schrieb Erdi Chen:
> This is a patch to call the context handles destructors and free the
> context bitmap entries when a process does not destroy its contexts
> before it exits. It saves context handles in a linked list in the
> drm_device struct. I decided to u
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Freitag, 20. Februar 2004 08:39 schrieb Erdi Chen:
This is a patch to call the context handles destructors and free the
context bitmap entries when a process does not destroy its contexts
before it exits. It saves context handles in a linked list in the
drm_device struct.
Erdi Chen wrote:
This is a patch to call the context handles destructors and free the
context bitmap entries when a process does not destroy its contexts
before it exits. It saves context handles in a linked list in the
drm_device struct. I decided to use per device list instead of a per
file
On Gwe, 2004-02-20 at 18:06, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> The patch looks ok to me, though I really don't know the code in this area
> particularly well. Any comments from anyone before applying?
VIA branch is out of date (I've been way too busy lately) but yes Im
happy, and the fix is relevant to th
Erdi Chen wrote:
This is a patch to call the context handles destructors and free the
context bitmap entries when a process does not destroy its contexts
before it exits. It saves context handles in a linked list in the
drm_device struct. I decided to use per device list instead of a per
file
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:56:20 +
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erdi Chen wrote:
> > This is a patch to call the context handles destructors and free the
> > context bitmap entries when a process does not destroy its contexts
> > before it exits. It saves context handles in a link
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:44:37 +0100
Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:56:20 +
> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
> >
> > I've committed this, but I'm just about to leave on holidays. If there are
> > any problems hopefully Erdi will be able
Felix Kühling wrote:
and many more which I suspect are just because the compiler got
confused. The problem seems to be that list_for_each_entry_safe is not
defined. Erdi, did you forget to include it in the patch or is my
working tree missing something?
Felix
Which kernel version are you usin
