Very interesting, I am using it with a AT power supply. I don't think
that would be the problem, windows d3d works pretty well. It seems that
the stability was better on the mach64 branch, amazingly though. Any
possibility I can use the nvagp driver for my ati card?
David Bronaugh wrote:
>
> I have a TNT2 in this machine, and I had some problems with AGP.=20
> Apparently, the kernel agpgart module may not account for all the bugs in=
> =20
> the MVP3 (the nvagp driver is quite a bit better here). Also, many MVP3=20
> boards have AT power, which means they have a linear power regulat
On Thu, 07 Feb 2002 12:02:29 Janne Pänkälä wrote:
> > Nicholas Charles Leippe wrote:
> > >
> > I have a radeon 7200, and it has awesome quality in 2d and 3d, but the
> > 3d is unstable with my via mvp3 (yes, that's a socket7) chipset.
>
> I had the very same problem and sad to say it is not solve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>What northbridge chipset does your motherboard use?
>
>On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Carl Busjahn wrote:
>
This is not a Athlon system, so it's a socket7 chipset.
I really don't know what the northbridge is on this motherboard, but
here's my /proc/pci:
PCI devices found:
Bu
Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:18:04PM -0500, Carl Busjahn wrote:
>
>>I just recently got a Radeon "QD" (7200), (it's $58 on newegg.com...)
>>and it's in DRI mode. I get good frame rates, (About 160fps in a
>>1024x768 window with pulsar -fps).
>>
>try
>'pulsar -fps -dela
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:18:04PM -0500, Carl Busjahn wrote:
> I just recently got a Radeon "QD" (7200), (it's $58 on newegg.com...)
> and it's in DRI mode. I get good frame rates, (About 160fps in a
> 1024x768 window with pulsar -fps).
try
'pulsar -fps -delay 0' to see actual framerate.
> Th
I just recently got a Radeon "QD" (7200), (it's $58 on newegg.com...)
and it's in DRI mode. I get good frame rates, (About 160fps in a
1024x768 window with pulsar -fps).
The problem is, it locks up somewhat unpredictably. The magic sysrq
will sync, unmount, and reboot my machine fine, and the
> Does anyone know of a OpenGL benchmarking program I can use to test
> compare various facets of the performance of graphics cards?
Quake 3, Viewperf (and/or GLperf), Mesa demos etc...
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://li
I upgraded to Mandrake 8.1 and everything is working fine.
Does anyone know of a OpenGL benchmarking program I can use to test
compare various facets of the performance of graphics cards?
Jens Owen wrote:
>
> > Robin Forster wrote:
> >
> > I just installed Mandrake 8 with X 4. I am having p
I just installed Mandrake 8 with X 4. I am
having problems with the OpenGL support. X loads fine but when I run
OpenGL applications they are all screwed up.
Any help would be appreciated since I am writing an
Open Source OpenGL application.
Robin FOrster
First, sorry for the double post, Yahoo mail said that
the first send failed(odd...), anyway,
I don't see why not using HW T&L would cause such a
drastic difference in performance. (Esp, since this
was on a highly clocked CPU - 1.33Ghz, I also tried
disabling HyperZ and associated features, but,
> The Radeon 7200 DRI drivers work, but performance is a
> problem. I get roughly 1/2 to 1/3 the performance in
> linux than in windows. I've tried quake3 and unreal
> tournament. In Windows I get about 100fps in UT, as
> opposed to 40 or so in Linux. (Quake3 was even
> worse...) Linux glxgears o
(Resend)
I've found 2 issues w/ the Radeon 7200 in Linux.
The first, I've seen with several other Radeons - 64mb
DDR, 32mb DDR, 64mb SDR. In the left hand side of the
screen, the mouse cursor will be extremely jumpy(or
just not update on movement at all), I've found that
setting sw_cursor fixes
There are 2 problems here:
With the current radeon driver the mouse is extremely
jumpy, or does not register movement at all when in
the left hand side of the screen. I've found that
setting Option sw_cursor, causes things to run
smoothly again.
With the current Radeon driver, I'm getting a
subs
14 matches
Mail list logo
