On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 23:55, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > I don't think this is a matter of the chip revision but rather what the
> > card manufacturer puts around the chip, like DDR vs. SDR RAM and 64-bit
> > vs. 128-bit memory interface and at which frequencies the chip an
Felix Kühling wrote:
I don't think this is a matter of the chip revision but rather what the
card manufacturer puts around the chip, like DDR vs. SDR RAM and 64-bit
vs. 128-bit memory interface and at which frequencies the chip and
memory are clocked.
Speaking of ram width, would it be possible to
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:25:55 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > >I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
> > >but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
> > >(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
> > >ma
Ian Romanick wrote:
> >I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
> >but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
> >(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
> >machine. I tested both 4.3.0 (Debian pre1v1) and latest
> >binary DRI on top, but it didn't ch
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
machine. I tested both 4.3.0 (Debian pre1v1) and latest
binary DRI on top, but it didn't change
Hi,
I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
machine. I tested both 4.3.0 (Debian pre1v1) and latest
binary DRI on top, but it didn't change much.
I tested both the DR
