[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Re: Re: Re: Voodoo 3 and 4.2.0

2002-05-10 Thread Frank Van Damme
On Friday 10 May 2002 05:45 pm, Billy Biggs wrote: >   Unfortunately, in X you can't yet change the desktop resolution, only > the visible resolution:  the 2D desktop will still eat up all the video > RAM.  So while it might work in Windows, I don't think it will work in X > until xrandr is done.

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Re: Re: Re: Voodoo 3 and 4.2.0

2002-05-10 Thread Billy Biggs
Frank Van Damme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Friday 10 May 2002 03:01 pm, Jules Bean wrote: > > If I run my desktop@1600x1200 on a voodoo 3 (which I am at the > > moment), but load a 3D game which switches the resolution down to > > something more sane like 800x600, will that game be able to use DRI

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Re: Re: Re: Voodoo 3 and 4.2.0

2002-05-10 Thread Frank Van Damme
On Friday 10 May 2002 03:01 pm, Jules Bean wrote: > If I run my desktop@1600x1200 on a voodoo 3 (which I am at the > moment), but load a 3D game which switches the resolution down to > something more sane like 800x600, will that game be able to use DRI > then, at that reduced resolution?  Or would

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Re: Re: Re: Voodoo 3 and 4.2.0

2002-05-10 Thread Jules Bean
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:00:51PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote: > On Thursday 09 May 2002 10:12 pm, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > Might not sound insane, but the bare fact is that it does not > > work in XFree86. I could care less personally if it ever does, > > as it is obsolete hardware. I onl