On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 04:20:58 -0400 (EDT)
"Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Felix [ISO-8859-1] Kühling wrote:
>
> >there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
> >disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
> >problem w
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Felix [ISO-8859-1] Kühling wrote:
>there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was
>disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the
>problem was that libexpat was not installed on the system. Could the
>snapshot build be changed to link t
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:51, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > BTW, have you added atimisc_drv.o to the r200, radeon and rage128
> > snapshots as a reaction to the recent radeon 2D driver problems? It
> > should be ati_drv.o instead.
>
> No
Michel, Felix,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> BTW, have you added atimisc_drv.o to the r200, radeon and rage128
> snapshots as a reaction to the recent radeon 2D driver problems? It
> should be ati_drv.o instead.
No, it always had been there (from the original dr
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:39, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > I'm OK with distributing libGL.so under that rationale.
>
> Done. It will affect binary snapshots built from now onwards.
BTW, have you added atimisc_drv.o to the r200, radeon
