>
> You could still generate a string to help with debug. Something like "Radeon QX"
> by converting the PCI ID to ASCII. Later when you get the family you could
> generate "Radeon R250 QX" for the string.
well if someone builds their kernel with pci strings turned off I persume
they know what the
--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so Linux no longer carries the device name around with it, it uses the
> kernel to get if support is there if not you get blank string,
You could still generate a string to help with debug. Something like "Radeon QX"
by converting the PCI ID to ASCII. L
>
> The patch looks good. However, doesn't drm_pci_id_list need to be updated for
> BSD to add the 2 new fields? Other than that, it looks good to me.
nope that's why there are two scripts, the bsd generates the info bsd
wants, the linux one generates the info linux wants..
so Linux no longer c
On Maw, 2004-04-20 at 18:26, Jon Smirl wrote:
> The kernel provides symbols for all of the PCI ID constants via pci_ids.h. The
> strings describing the hardware are duplicated against drivers/pci/pci.ids. How
pci.ids isnt used by 2.6, its primarily used by lspci in user space, and
the name stuff h
The kernel provides symbols for all of the PCI ID constants via pci_ids.h. The
strings describing the hardware are duplicated against drivers/pci/pci.ids. How
do the kernel people feel about us not using their symbols and strings? We're
creating duplicate definitions for these items. I seem to reca
Dave Airlie wrote:
http://freedesktop.org/~airlied/drm_pci_ids.diff
Same as last patch except now it uses the Linux PCI structures in the DRM,
it still doesn't do any of the other stuff,
again I want to have this stuff in nice clean steps so breakage is
obvious,
I believe this is a good first step
http://freedesktop.org/~airlied/drm_pci_ids.diff
Same as last patch except now it uses the Linux PCI structures in the DRM,
it still doesn't do any of the other stuff,
again I want to have this stuff in nice clean steps so breakage is
obvious,
I believe this is a good first step to satisfying t
