Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
What I'd really like to be able to do now is build the dri drivers
directly out of the Mesa tree.
Definately. Slate that up for 6.1, I'll certainly work on that issue.
It's not too hard - I had it working on the embedded branch a while ago.
In gen
Otto Solares wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:41:45PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
What I'd really like to be able to do now is build the dri drivers directly
out of the Mesa tree.
Does this means that finally we will see XFree and linux-solo build
it's drivers from Mesa-newtree/src/drivers/dr
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:44:31PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:41:45PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > What I'd really like to be able to do now is build the dri drivers directly
> > out of the Mesa tree.
>
> Does this means that finally we will see XFree and linux-so
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:41:45PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> What I'd really like to be able to do now is build the dri drivers directly
> out of the Mesa tree.
Does this means that finally we will see XFree and linux-solo build
it's drivers from Mesa-newtree/src/drivers/dri or this is not t
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 00:28, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:25:23AM +0100, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> >
> > What about a branch corresponding to the Mesa stable branch though?
> > Then David could grab that for XFree86.
>
> It's currently mesa_6_0_branch.
Yes, I mean a corresp
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:25:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:41, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > Do we want to bring Mesa 6.0's branch into the DRI repository now or
> > > stick with the way we have it currently ?
> > >
> > > I guess if we
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:41, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > Do we want to bring Mesa 6.0's branch into the DRI repository now or
> > stick with the way we have it currently ?
> >
> > I guess if we stick with the way it is now, then most developers will
> > track Mesa's trun
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:17:20PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > This is a good time to remind people/establish the principle that
> > driver
> > > bug fixes should be propogat
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:52:32PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:21:42PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>> >> There are quite a few Radeon-relate
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > This is a good time to remind people/establish the principle that
> driver
> > bug fixes should be propogated to the mesa-6_0_branch of the Mesa
> > repository. Brian's always done
Alan Hourihane wrote:
What I'd really like to be able to do now is build the dri drivers directly
out of the Mesa tree.
Definately. Slate that up for 6.1, I'll certainly work on that issue.
It's not too hard - I had it working on the embedded branch a while ago.
In general, the Mesa make syst
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:41:45PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>This is a good time to remind people/establish the principle that driver
> >>bug fixes should be propogated to the mesa-6_0_branch of t
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
This is a good time to remind people/establish the principle that driver
bug fixes should be propogated to the mesa-6_0_branch of the Mesa
repository. Brian's always done a good job of making sure core mesa fix
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> This is a good time to remind people/establish the principle that driver
> bug fixes should be propogated to the mesa-6_0_branch of the Mesa
> repository. Brian's always done a good job of making sure core mesa fixes
> get copied
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:21:42PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
> >> There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
> >> bugs.xfree86.org, including several
David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups.
Has anyone followed them up?
D
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>> There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
>> bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups.
>>
>> Has anyone followed them up?
>
>David
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
> There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
> bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups.
>
> Has anyone followed them up?
David,
I suspect not with XFree86's DRI drivers still being based on Mesa 4
There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in
bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups.
Has anyone followed them up?
David
--
David Dawes
developer/release engineer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
