> I'm planing on
> having DRISUP_BOTH, DRISUP_BSD, DRISUP_LINUX, DRISUP_NONE
> defined for the 3rd element.
I dont like the "both" thing. The design looks for me rather
like a bitfild than an enum... so this would be the solution:
(DRISUP_BSD | DRISUP_LINUX)
a DRISUP_ALL would make more s
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 15:04, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > I'm using the new linux devfs and It seams to me that the DRI can't at this time
>use devfs the
> way
> > it should. If i'm not mistaken the kernel module dosen't realy know how to find
>supported
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently running Linux GL programs on FreeBSD doesn't work for most
> people because xf86drm.c checks to see if the dri device has the major
> number expected. When using linux *_dri.so's (which use this code) they
> find the FreeBSD dri device, whic
