W dniu 1 marca 2010 17:37 użytkownik Michel Dänzer napisał:
> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 10:33 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä
>> napisał:
>> > Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense.
>> >
>> > You could use a completion.
>> >
>> > init_co
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 10:33 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä napisał:
> > Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense.
> >
> > You could use a completion.
> >
> > init_completion(vbl_irq);
> > enable_vbl_irq();
> > wait_for_completion(vbl_irq
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä napisał:
> Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense.
>
> You could use a completion.
>
> init_completion(vbl_irq);
> enable_vbl_irq();
> wait_for_completion(vbl_irq);
> disable_vbl_irq();
> and call complete(vbl_irq) in the interrupt han
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> Following macro is soemthing that seems to work fine for us, but instead
> introducing this to radeon KMS only, I'd like to propose adding this to whole
> wait.h. Do you this it's something we should place there? Can someone take
> this
> patch for m
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 06:33:57PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> W dniu 26 lutego 2010 17:14 użytkownik Andrew Morton
> napisał:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki wrote:
> >
> >> +#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
> >> \
> >> +({
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 17:14 użytkownik Andrew Morton
napisał:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki wrote:
>
>> +#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
>> \
>> +({ \
>> + long ret = timeout; \
>> +
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki wrote:
> +#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
> \
> +({ \
> +long ret = timeout; \
> +\
> +DEFINE_WAIT(wait); \
>
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>> Date: 21 lutego 2010 15:10
>> Subject: [PATCH][RFC] time: add wait_interruptible_timeout macro to
>> sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
>> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List ,
>> dri-devel@lists.sourceforg
CH][RFC] time: add wait_interruptible_timeout macro to
> sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List ,
> dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> CC: Rafał Miłecki
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
> ---
> We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync wi
Forwarding to ppl I could often notice in git log time.h
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
From: Rafał Miłecki
Date: 21 lutego 2010 15:10
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] time: add wait_interruptible_timeout macro to
sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List ,
dri-devel
Ping?
Can I interpret lack of objections as permission for committing that?
If so, by which tree should we get this patch mainline?
Dave: this patch is needed for radeon driver. Can we get this through
drm-2.6 maybe?
--
Rafał
---
W dniu 21 lutego 2010 16:01 użytkownik Thomas Hellstrom
napisał:
> Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
>> ---
>> We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync with VLBANK
>> for
>> reclocking engine/memory. The easiest and cleanest way seems to be
>> sleeping i
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
> ---
> We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync with VLBANK for
> reclocking engine/memory. The easiest and cleanest way seems to be sleeping in
> timer handler just before reclocking. Then our IRQ handler calls wake_up and
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync with VLBANK for
reclocking engine/memory. The easiest and cleanest way seems to be sleeping in
timer handler just before reclocking. Then our IRQ handler calls wake_up and we
continue reclocking.
As you
14 matches
Mail list logo
