On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
wrote:
- Without this change I get a general protection fault.
- Also use PTR_ERR where applicable.
I just want to make sure I understand, but really
Maarten Maathuis wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
wrote:
- Without this change I get a general protection fault.
- Also use PTR_ERR where applicable.
I just
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote:
- Without this change I get a general protection fault.
- Also use PTR_ERR where applicable.
I just want to make sure I understand, but really the only bit of this
patch that matters is:
@@ -556,9 +559,10 @@ int
- Without this change I get a general protection fault.
- Also use PTR_ERR where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c | 18 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git