On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 23:42 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> IIRC there have been a patch to xorg for that and to DRM
> too. Give it a try :)
For whatever reason, I can't seem to build xorg right now. I'll have a
try another time, but thanks for the heads-up.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: T
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 23:26 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:36 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > The problem is simple: when setting up the AGP aperture, it's putting it
> > after the framebuffer + CONFIG_APER_SIZE, which is wrong. On that guy,
> > CONFIG_APER_SIZE
On 8/25/05, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:36 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > The problem is simple: when setting up the AGP aperture, it's putting it
> > after the framebuffer + CONFIG_APER_SIZE, which is wrong. On that guy,
> > CONFIG_APER_SIZE mig
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:36 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The problem is simple: when setting up the AGP aperture, it's putting it
> after the framebuffer + CONFIG_APER_SIZE, which is wrong. On that guy,
> CONFIG_APER_SIZE might only be _half_ of the mapped vram space (as the
> card can b
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 16:44 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> >I can remember from the top of my head but there is maybe some patch
> >that could be revealent for ppc not included in this snapshot. Thus i think
> >you should consider trying building xorg from cvs. Anyway with
Jerome Glisse wrote:
I can remember from the top of my head but there is maybe some patch
that could be revealent for ppc not included in this snapshot. Thus i think
you should consider trying building xorg from cvs. Anyway with a g4 it will
compiles a lot faster than on dumb x86 ;)
Ok, I'll
On 6/21/05, Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 10:54, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On 6/21/05, Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > Any idea where I should start looking for the source of the lockups or
>
Hi,
I mainly used r300 on ppc so far thus yes it works.
Good to know.
I am using it on x86 for
the 9800 lockup. But as i used a g5 i don't know if there is an issue with the
agp of g4, don't think so... And IIRC someone told me that it worked on a
powerbook which is, i presume, what Johannes
On 6/21/05, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >I mainly used r300 on ppc so far thus yes it works.
> >
> Good to know.
>
> >I am using it on x86 for
> >the 9800 lockup. But as i used a g5 i don't know if there is an issue with
> >the
> >agp of g4, don't think so... And IIRC some
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 10:54, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On 6/21/05, Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > Any idea where I should start looking for the source of the lockups or
what else to do?
> >
> > The problem is likely either due to t
On 6/21/05, Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Any idea where I should start looking for the source of the lockups or what
> > else to do?
>
> The problem is likely either due to the radeon memory controller - in
> particular registers li
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi,
I just tried the latest r300 cvs code (with current mesa cvs, latest
Xorg snapshot) but all I get is a lockup as soon as the X server starts.
If I have debugging enabled, I get a loop of radeon_do_cp_idle calls.
Hardware is:
:00:10.0 VGA comp
Hi,
I just tried the latest r300 cvs code (with current mesa cvs, latest
Xorg snapshot) but all I get is a lockup as soon as the X server starts.
If I have debugging enabled, I get a loop of radeon_do_cp_idle calls.
Hardware is:
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [
13 matches
Mail list logo
