Re: [r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

Brian Paul wrote: > Rune Petersen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully >> working fragment.position for the r300 driver. >> >> This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact >> that it depends on functional changes in r300_ve

Re: [r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

Rune Petersen wrote: > Hi, > > I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully > working fragment.position for the r300 driver. > > This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact > that it depends on functional changes in r300_vertexprog.c > (r300_select

Re: [r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

On 11/16/06, Rune Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully > working fragment.position for the r300 driver. > > This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact > that it depends on functional changes in r

[r300] fragment.position patch (RFC)

Hi, I finally managed to iron out the last issue with getting a fully working fragment.position for the r300 driver. This should really require the big discussion if it wasn't for the fact that it depends on functional changes in r300_vertexprog.c (r300_select_vertex_shader4). The patches: r300