Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Roland Scheidegger [2006-05-30 22:33]:
>> Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
>>> I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
>>> properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
>>>
>>> So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
>>> adds that
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Roland Scheidegger [2006-05-30 22:33]:
>
>>Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
>>
>>>I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
>>>properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
>>>
>>>So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
>>>adds tha
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
>>> If there are no objections, I'll commit this in a few days.
>> Wouldn't it be simpler to just change t_src to always apply
>> src->NegateBase? I can't see a need for that "src->NegateBase ?
>> VSF_FLAG_ALL : VSF_FLAG_NONE", as the mesa parser sets all 4 bits anyway
>>
Roland Scheidegger [2006-05-30 22:33]:
> Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> > I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
> > properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
> >
> > So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
> > adds that.
> >
> > Question: is it
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Hi,
> I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
> properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
>
> So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
> adds that.
>
> Question: is it okay to assume that "NegateBase" in
> struct pro
Hi,
I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
adds that.
Question: is it okay to assume that "NegateBase" in
struct prog_src_register will always be filled the w
