Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-16 Thread Dave Airlie
> > Well, I did not know about the GART problem. So this means that > RV370s and XPRESS will be listed both separately in the driver in the > future? They certainly don't function as an RV350 and of course they > aren't quite compatable then. The RV350 and RV370 are more or less programatically

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-16 Thread Mauro Tassinari
>Module Size Used by >appletalk 27696 2 >ax25 45784 2 >ipx21164 2 >radeon 94112 0 > >this of course on 2.6.15, since 2.6.16 completely hangs, and no other info can be gathered. BTW, modprobe-ing radeon.ko (no

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-15 Thread Jesse Allen
On 2/13/06, Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 16:27 -0700 schrieb Jesse Allen: > > > > Well a while back, I hacked in the pci id for my Xpress 200M (5955), > > which is basically an RV370 with no dedicated vram. I did the same > > thing and claimed an RV350, whi

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-15 Thread mtassinari
>> The ID removed by Dave's patch is the only ID listed for an RV370 >> chips >> (the other RV370's aren't listed in the radeon DRM driver). >> >> I suspect Dave and Mauro having unrelated problems. >> >> >Linus >> >> cu >> Adrian > >The X300 has two pci ids: >:05:00.0 0300: 100

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-15 Thread Gerhard Mack
ng List , > Mauro Tassinari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], > dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 200

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Felix Kühling
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 16:27 -0700 schrieb Jesse Allen: > On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id > > > is the only one we have in this driver for

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Jesse Allen
On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id > > is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370. > > It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too la

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:50:52AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >... > I just worry whether (a) the other added PCI ID's are any good for that > core and (b) whether the bug was really introduced with some of the other > changes. I admit that (b) is pretty unlikely, but it would be good to > tes

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:42:09PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments? > > Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well, lspci stupidly > suppresses the ID entirely, but the string seems to

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So I decided to just remove it. Even if there is some other bug that could > make it work again, we can always just re-add it at that time. In the > meantime, this should fix both DaveJs and Mauros problems, and is clearly > no worse than 2.6.15

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id > is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370. It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too lazy to actually see if the other entries that claim to be RV350's

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Alex Deucher
On 2/13/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Com

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Dave's patch removes the entry for the card with the 0x5b60. > > According to his bug report, Mauro has a Radeon X300SE that should > have the 0x5b70 according to pci.ids from pciutils No. Look closer: 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Techn

Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions

2006-02-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments? > > > > Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact