I've added the new PCI ids to the shared/drm_pciids.txt
Dave.
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 April 2004 07:42, Vykupitel wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've got problem with tdfx driver.Someone told me that tdfx driver
> > development is halted,but I need to add one type of c
Ryan Underwood wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:42:48PM +0200, Vykupitel wrote:
Hello, I've got problem with tdfx driver.Someone told me that tdfx
driver development is halted,but I need to add one type of card to
it.I have Daytona card which is prototype of Voodoo4 4200 with
VSA-101 which suppor
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:42:48PM +0200, Vykupitel wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got problem with tdfx driver.Someone told me that tdfx driver
> development is halted,but I need to add one type of card to it.I have
> Daytona card which is prototype of Voodoo4 4200 with VSA-101 which
> support DDR RAM an
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 07:42, Vykupitel wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got problem with tdfx driver.Someone told me that tdfx driver
> development is halted,but I need to add one type of card to it.I have
> Daytona card which is prototype of Voodoo4 4200 with VSA-101 which
> support DDR RAM and tdfx di
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:18:31PM +, Felipe Bugno wrote:
> I'm a user of voodoo 5 5500 board and i love this board.
Could you check bug I've described few days ago (Blender related) with
development driver (from WWW)?
--
http://decopter.sf.net - free unrealistic helicopter simulator
-
Felipe,
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:18:31PM +, Felipe Bugno wrote:
My question is about the voodoo and SLI.
First I would like to point out that I don't fully understand what you
mean with SLI (Scan Line Interleave I suppose) and its implications with
the voodoo driver. Spite of that, the co
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 04:18:31PM +, Felipe Bugno wrote:
> Why the radeon developers don't donate 30 minutes per day (or per week)
> to colaborate with SLI work??
As one of the people making contributions to the Radeon driver, I'll try to
answer that.
1. Every day the interested in 3dfx har
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> Just comment it out of the Imakefile in mesa/src/drv.
That would be the smart thing to do, wouldn't it? :-)
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> I'm going to be committing my latest work, so expect the driver to be
> broken for a day or so. Note that it may not even compile, so you may
> want to avoid updating until I am done.
Just comment it out of the Imakefile in mesa/src/drv.
Keith
Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2001 20:58 schrieben Sie:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:49:00PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Sorry for the little delay but my natural hardware needed some food...
> >
> > Alan you are the man!
> > I will spend you some beer if you ever come to Germany.
> > But I think you c
Andreas Ehliar wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:56:42PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> > > The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
> > > (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
> >
> > Isn't it generally best to use the module from the CVS/packages in any
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:56:42PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> > The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
> > (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
>
> Isn't it generally best to use the module from the CVS/packages in any
> case, no matter if the kernel mo
> The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
> (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
Isn't it generally best to use the module from the CVS/packages in any
case, no matter if the kernel module works? Just alone for the fact that we
then know that the driver mod
> The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
> (The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
>
> Zephaniah E. Hull.
I can't second that.
2.4.4-pre8 (latest pre) was broken (rwsem problem) and the DRI drm module
worked fine but the final 2.4.4 kernel module works smoot
The DRM module from the DRI CVS seems to work fine in 2.4.4.
(The one in the kernel however does seem to be broken.)
Zephaniah E. Hull.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:50:55AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> > You generally need a 2.4.x kernel for the current D
15 matches
Mail list logo
