On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:44 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> DRM_INFO("Used old pci detect: framebuffer loaded\n");
Most cards have a framebuffer... this is about framebuffer _devices_. :)
--
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:44:51 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie wrote:
|
| DRM_INFO("Used old pci detect: framebuffer loaded\n");
|
| we print that... it should be enough I think..
|
| Dave.
| On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Mike Mestnik wrote:
|
| > Not to be a nit prick, but shoulden't there at least be a warni
DRM_INFO("Used old pci detect: framebuffer loaded\n");
we print that... it should be enough I think..
Dave.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Not to be a nit prick, but shoulden't there at least be a warning that
> VesaFB and the DRM are using the same Hardware? Thought this is
> su
Not to be a nit prick, but shoulden't there at least be a warning that
VesaFB and the DRM are using the same Hardware? Thought this is
supported.
"Warning: VesaFB and the DRM are using the\n"
"same Hardware, Thought this is supported."
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the curr
Looks good to me please feel free to commit to CVS, myself and the lk are
an impasse but I'll try and break it over the weekend :-)
Dave.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Here is the current version of the patch. As soon as Dave approves it
> will go in.
>
> The problem was a conflict be
Here is the current version of the patch. As soon as Dave approves it
will go in.
The problem was a conflict between VesaFB and DRM. The patch detects
VesaFB and puts DRM in stealth mode.
=
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New an
I wrote:
This appears to work for Linux 2.6; I haven't been able to test it
anywhere
else. However, it should be quite close to no change at all
everywhere else.
Oh, and as I've said before, I can't *really* test it, because I don't
have the cards in question. :-P It builds and the module a
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Yeesh. Attached are the patch and the new files. I couldn't find a good
way to abstract this any further than I already did without breaking
other abstractions; hence the extra files.)
Tell me what sort of changelog you'd like.
This appears to wor
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Yeesh. Attached are the patch and the new files. I couldn't find a good
way to abstract this any further than I already did without breaking
other abstractions; hence the extra files.)
Tell me what sort of changelog you'd like.
This appears to work for Linux 2.6; I haven'
