Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 11:48 AM, Stephane Marchesin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/07, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
It's all delightfully simple, but I'm starting to reconsider whether
the lockless bullet point is realistic. Note, the drawable lock is
On 11/28/07, Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my ideal world, the entity which knows and cares about cliprects
should be the one that does the swapbuffers, or at least is in control
of the process. That entity is the X server.
Instead of tying ourselves into knots trying to
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On 11/28/07, *Keith Whitwell* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my ideal world, the entity which knows and cares about cliprects
should be the one that does the swapbuffers, or at least is in control
of the process. That entity is
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:43:18PM +0100, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
This is what I want to do too. Especially since in the nvidia case we don't
have the issue of routing vblank interrupts to user space for that.
So, the only issue I'm worried about is the latency induced by this
approach.
