On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:35 -0700, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 21:13 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> > Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Tue, 2009-07-21 a
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:35 -0700, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 21:13 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:22 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 21:13 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:22 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:00 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> >>>
> >>
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:22 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:00 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:27 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>>
>>>
Jerome Glisse skrev:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas i attach a reworked
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:22 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:00 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wro
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 21:22 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:00 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 4) We could now skip the ttm_tt_populate()
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:27 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> >> Jerome Glisse skrev:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> >>> this one should
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:00 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > >
> > > 4) We could now skip the ttm_tt_populate() in ttm_tt_set_caching, since
> > > it will always allocate cached
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> > 4) We could now skip the ttm_tt_populate() in ttm_tt_set_caching, since
> > it will always allocate cached pages and then transition them.
> >
>
> Okay 4) is bad, what ha
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:53 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Jerome Glisse skrev:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> > this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
> > helps on AGP system, now the bottleneck is in mesa vertex
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:06 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> 2009/6/30 Thomas Hellström :
> > Jerome Glisse skrev:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 10:00 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thomas i
2009/6/30 Thomas Hellström :
> Jerome Glisse skrev:
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 10:00 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
this one should
Jerome Glisse skrev:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 10:00 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
>>> this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It de
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 10:00 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> > this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
> > helps on AGP system, now the
>
> I think it's better to fix userspace to not allocate as much buffer per
> frame as it does now rather than having a pool of wb pages, i removed
> it because on my 64M box memory is getting tight, we need to compute
> the number of page we still based on memory. Also i think it's ok
> to assume
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 08:31 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Dave Airlie skrev:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> >> this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 10:00 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> > this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
> > helps on AGP system, now the
Dave Airlie skrev:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
>> this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
>> helps on AGP system, now the bottleneck is in mesa vertex's dma
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
> helps on AGP system, now the bottleneck is in mesa vertex's dma
> allocation.
>
My original v
Jerome Glisse skrev:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
> this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
> helps on AGP system, now the bottleneck is in mesa vertex's dma
> allocation.
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome
>
Hi, Jerome!
In general i
Hi,
Thomas i attach a reworked page pool allocator based on Dave works,
this one should be ok with ttm cache status tracking. It definitely
helps on AGP system, now the bottleneck is in mesa vertex's dma
allocation.
Cheers,
Jerome
>From d2581e2a97e9c694fd1238f1a5652e1f385b5636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
22 matches
Mail list logo