[Bug 30102] [RADEON:KMS:RS780:CP] ring test failed

2011-03-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Summary|Radeon : ring test failed |[RADEON:KMS:RS780:CP] ring ||test failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug

[Bug 30102] Radeon : ring test failed

2011-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30102 Mathieu Belanger changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|All |x86-64 -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug 30102] Radeon : ring test failed

2011-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30102 --- Comment #3 from Mathieu Belanger 2011-02-28 16:32:57 --- 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge Alternate 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) 00:02.0 PCI bridge:

[Bug 30102] Radeon : ring test failed

2011-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30102 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Belanger 2011-02-28 16:32:39 --- If you see the dmesg, you can see that this error is present on the two video card (I tested with the onboard one disabled, no change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kern

[Bug 30102] Radeon : ring test failed

2011-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30102 --- Comment #1 from Mathieu Belanger 2011-02-28 16:31:29 --- Created an attachment (id=49632) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=49632) .config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug 30102] Radeon : ring test failed

2011-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30102 Mathieu Belanger changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||2.6.38-rc6 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 30102] New: Radeon : ring test failed

2011-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30102 Summary: Radeon : ring test failed Product: Drivers Version: 2.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority

[Bug 14628] drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed

2011-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 14628] drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed

2011-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-23 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:29:03AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Die, 2010-12-21 at 11:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Dave Airlie > > > > On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa > > but the test decided it was. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2010-12-21 at 11:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa > but the test decided it was. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > --- > drivers/video/fbmem.c |2 +- > 1 files

[PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-20 Thread Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa but the test decided it was. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/video/fbmem.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbmem.c

Test.

2010-12-05 Thread Mike Mestnik
Test of email delivery from legacy list. -- What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto

Re: [PATCH 09/14] drm/edid: Add test for monitor reduced blanking support.

2010-05-06 Thread Mark Marshall
Adam Jackson wrote: > The generic block walk callback looks like overkill, but we'll need it > for other detailed block walks in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 47 --- > 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+),

[PATCH 09/14] drm/edid: Add test for monitor reduced blanking support.

2010-03-29 Thread Adam Jackson
The generic block walk callback looks like overkill, but we'll need it for other detailed block walks in the future. Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 47 --- 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/driv

[Bug 27148] Failed assertion in piglit test 'bin/fbo-flushing -auto' with RV790

2010-03-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27148 --- Comment #2 from Török Edwin 2010-03-26 03:34:58 PST --- This prevents blender 2.5's "OpenGL render image", and "OpenGL render animation" from working. It says it failed to create OpenGL offscreen buffer: GPUFrameBuffer: framebuffer

[Bug 26933] r600 driver (rv730): piglit test failures

2010-03-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 --- Comment #5 from Chris Rankin 2010-03-23 06:11:36 PST --- See bug 27141 for the reason that vertProg1 and vp-bad-program segfault. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Bug 27144] piglit glean/depthStencil test core dumps with RV790

2010-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27144 --- Comment #1 from Chris Rankin 2010-03-18 16:51:10 PST --- I don't understand the "why" on this one, just that the SIGSEGV happens within the following WRITE_DEPTH macro: #define WRITE_DEPTH( _x, _y, d )

[Bug 27142] piglit "glean/pbo -o -v" test dumps core

2010-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27142 --- Comment #1 from Chris Rankin 2010-03-18 13:38:56 PST --- This test is failing in these following statements from glean/tpbo.cpp: glGenBuffersARB_func(1, pb_pack); glBindBufferARB_func(GL_PIXEL_PACK_BUFFER_ARB

[Bug 27148] Failed assertion in piglit test 'bin/fbo-flushing -auto' with RV790

2010-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27148 --- Comment #1 from Chris Rankin 2010-03-18 13:18:17 PST --- This test is failing for r600_dri.so because glCheckFramebufferStatusEXT() is returning GL_FRAMEBUFFER_UNSUPPORTED. The reason that it returns "GL_FRAMEBUFFER_UNSUPPORTE

[Bug 27149] New: Failed assertion in piglit test 'fbo-pbo-readpixels-small -auto' with RV790

2010-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27149 Summary: Failed assertion in piglit test 'fbo-pbo-readpixels- small -auto' with RV790 Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version:

[Bug 27148] New: Failed assertion in piglit test 'bin/fbo-flushing -auto' with RV790

2010-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27148 Summary: Failed assertion in piglit test 'bin/fbo-flushing -auto' with RV790 Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) S

[Bug 27147] New: piglit "fdo23670-drawpix_stencil -auto" test dumps core with RV790

2010-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27147 Summary: piglit "fdo23670-drawpix_stencil -auto" test dumps core with RV790 Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) S

[Bug 27144] New: piglit glean/depthStencil test core dumps with RV790

2010-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27144 Summary: piglit glean/depthStencil test core dumps with RV790 Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 27142] New: piglit "glean/pbo -o -v" test dumps core

2010-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27142 Summary: piglit "glean/pbo -o -v" test dumps core Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 26962] New: fbo/fbo-nodepth-test: Invalid command stream

2010-03-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26962 Summary: fbo/fbo-nodepth-test: Invalid command stream Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

[Bug 26933] r600 driver (rv730): piglit test failures

2010-03-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 --- Comment #4 from Török Edwin 2010-03-08 04:22:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > > These failures are all in common Mesa code and are not specific to r600. > There > are already bugs reported for most, if not all, of them. Search b

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-08 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:30:38AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Daniel Stone wrote: > > FWIW, Option "ModulePath" in xorg.conf lets you more or less do this; > > the usual approach is to install your new server + drivers into a > > separate prefix. > > The thing is, Xorg has

[Bug 26933] r600 driver (rv730): piglit test failures

2010-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 --- Comment #3 from Ian Romanick 2010-03-07 14:03:29 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > glslparsertest/dataType13.frag > glslparsertest/dataType5.frag > gls

[Bug 26933] r600 driver (rv730): piglit test failures

2010-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 Török Edwin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|r600: piglit test failures |r600 driver (rv730): piglit

[Bug 26933] r600: piglit test failures

2010-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 --- Comment #2 from Török Edwin 2010-03-07 03:04:39 PST --- I've run the tests like this: ./piglit-run.py tests/r500.tests results/r500_nopbo.results Where the only difference in tests/r500.tests is that I enabled glean quick mode (was taki

[Bug 26933] r600: piglit test failures

2010-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 --- Comment #1 from Török Edwin 2010-03-07 03:03:32 PST --- Created an attachment (id=33826) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=33826) log Full output from dmesg, Xorg.0.log, and glxinfo. -- Configure bugmail: http://bug

[Bug 26933] New: r600: piglit test failures

2010-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933 Summary: r600: piglit test failures Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:49 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Stone > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:41:43 +0200 > > > I understand that you guys are upset about this, so maybe you'd like to > > donate, say, 10% of your developer base to help out? That'd be pretty > > ace. > > You have to supp

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread David Miller
From: Jesse Barnes Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:02:44 -0800 > So from that perspective, the graphics stack is the most complex one in > Linux by a long shot. It's even worse than if we had STREAMS > networking with a ton of different modules up in userspace messing with > protocol. :) Maybe :-) --

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:54:06 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > From: Xavier Bestel > Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:50:24 +0100 > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:49 -0800, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Daniel Stone > >> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:41:43 +0200 > >> > >> > I understand that you guys are

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread David Miller
From: Xavier Bestel Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:50:24 +0100 > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:49 -0800, David Miller wrote: >> From: Daniel Stone >> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:41:43 +0200 >> >> > I understand that you guys are upset about this, so maybe you'd like to >> > donate, say, 10% of your develope

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Daniel Stone wrote: > > FWIW, Option "ModulePath" in xorg.conf lets you more or less do this; > the usual approach is to install your new server + drivers into a > separate prefix. The thing is, Xorg has - and I think for _very_ good reasons - deprecated using xorg.conf at

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:53:46 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > > Whereas everytime I wanted to do that with Xorg it was such a pain that > > I want to keep away from that mess. > > Actually, take it fr

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Stone
e_ thing I really wish could be done would be to make it > easier to install things side-by-side - and with the modularization, you > really do want to do it module-by-module. One of the things that makes it > so easy to test the kernel is that when you install one kernel, that > d

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:49:32AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Stone > > I understand that you guys are upset about this, so maybe you'd like to > > donate, say, 10% of your developer base to help out? That'd be pretty > > ace. > > You have to support less than %10 of the amount of

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:49:32 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Stone > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:41:43 +0200 > > > I understand that you guys are upset about this, so maybe you'd like to > > donate, say, 10% of your developer base to help out? That'd be pretty > > ace. > > You have

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > Whereas everytime I wanted to do that with Xorg it was such a pain that > I want to keep away from that mess. Actually, take it from me: Xorg is _pleasant_ to test these days. Ok, so that's partly compared to the mess it _used_ t

Re: Making Xorg easier to test

2010-03-05 Thread David Miller
From: Daniel Stone Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:41:43 +0200 > I understand that you guys are upset about this, so maybe you'd like to > donate, say, 10% of your developer base to help out? That'd be pretty > ace. You have to support less than %10 of the amount of hardware we have to support. --

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:22:27AM -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > Why can't there be a 'Linus Torvalds' for Xorg accepting patches from > > various > > maintainers and keeping the whole thing tied up? Why can't it mimic the > > 'make menucon

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > Why can't there be a 'Linus Torvalds' for Xorg accepting patches from various > maintainers and keeping the whole thing tied up? Why can't it mimic the > 'make menuconfig' way of selecting what to compile to have the guarantee that > the who

Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:00:30 +0100, "Carlos R. Mafra" said: > Why can't there be a 'Linus Torvalds' for Xorg accepting patches from various > maintainers and keeping the whole thing tied up? Why can't it mimic the > 'make menuconfig' way of selecting what to compile to have the guarantee that > th

Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)

2010-03-05 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Fri 5.Mar'10 at 8:44:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Yeah. I've seen a few other bad arguments as well: > >'exploding test matrix' > > This is often the result of _another_ bad technical decision: > over-modularization. > > Xorg, mesa

[Bug 26710] New: wine make test segfaults in r600_dri.so

2010-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26710 Summary: wine make test segfaults in r600_dri.so Product: DRI Version: XOrg CVS Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon: Skip dma copy test in benchmark if card doesn't have dma engine.

2010-02-10 Thread Pauli Nieminen
goto out_cleanup; + + /* r100 doesn't have dma engine so skip the test */ + if (rdev->asic->copy_dma) { + + start_jiffies = jiffies; + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + r = radeon_fence_create(rdev, &fence); +

[PATCH] drm/radeon/kms: Test rdev->bios centrally in combios_get_table_offset().

2010-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
opefully this central test will be more robust. Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 40 +++--- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_co

[patch 2/6] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx.c: correct NULL test

2010-02-02 Thread akpm
From: Julia Lawall Test the just-allocated value for NULL rather than some other value. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @@ expression x,y; statement S; @@ x = \(kmalloc\|kcalloc\|kzalloc\)(...); ( if ((x) == NULL) S | if ( - y + x

[PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon/kms: r600/r700 don't test ib if ib initialization fails

2010-01-17 Thread Jerome Glisse
If ib initialization failed don't try to test ib as it will result in an oops (accessing NULL ib buffer ptr). Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 13 +++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rv770.c | 13 +++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+

[PATCH] drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c: move a dereference below the NULL test

2009-12-29 Thread Darren Jenkins
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Coverity CID: 13334 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c index 4cdd8b4..f3a8380 100644 --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c

[PATCH] drm/radeon/radeon_device.c: move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-12-29 Thread Darren Jenkins
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Coverity CID: 13335 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 7c68480..0c51f8e 100644 --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon

[PATCH] gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c: move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-12-29 Thread Darren Jenkins
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Coverity CID: 13338 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c index b79ecc4..2f349a3 100644 --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c

[PATCH] drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c: add a NULL test before dereference

2009-12-29 Thread Darren Jenkins
The encoder variable can be NULL in this function so I believe it should be checked before dereference. Coverity CID: 13253 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c index 2016156..b82ae61 100644 --- drivers/g

[PATCH 3/5] drivers/gpu: Correct NULL test

2009-12-27 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall Test the just-allocated value for NULL rather than some other value. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @@ expression x,y; statement S; @@ x = \(kmalloc\|kcalloc\|kzalloc\)(...); ( if ((x) == NULL) S | if ( - y + x

Re: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon: move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-12-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 23:44:30 +1100, Darren Jenkins wrote: > If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the > NULL test. > > Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c: move a dereference below the NULL test

2009-12-24 Thread Darren Jenkins
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Coverity CID: 13334 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c index cb4cd97..f4f5942 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon: move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-12-24 Thread Darren Jenkins
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c index b79ecc4..2f349a3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c: add a NULL test before dereference

2009-12-24 Thread Darren Jenkins
The encoder variable can be NULL in this function so I believe it should be checked before dereference. Coverity CID: 13253 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c index 5eece18..3ba86fc 100644 --- a/drive

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c: move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-12-24 Thread Darren Jenkins
If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Coverity CID: 13335 Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 02bcdb1..c0104b0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon

[Bug 14628] drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed

2009-11-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|14230 | Regression|Yes

[Bug 14628] drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed

2009-11-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628 --- Comment #2 from Christian Hartmann 2009-11-17 10:27:12 --- Created an attachment (id=23813) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23813) lspci Linux oddysseus 2.6.32-rc7 #1 Mon Nov 16 16:24:25 CET 2009 i686 GNU/Linux lspci

[Bug 14628] drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed

2009-11-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628 Jérôme Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gli...@freedesktop.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 14628] New: drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed

2009-11-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14628 Summary: drm/ksm -> s2disk -> resume -> [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed Product: Drivers Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.32-rc6 Platform: All

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: ATI radeon fails with "iommu=soft swiotlb=force" (seen on RV730/RV740 and RS780/RS800) . Test commited for JF

2009-10-03 Thread Boris Derzhavets
S780/RS800) . Test commited for JF To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, xen-de...@lists.xensource.com, jbeul...@novell.com, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 5:07 PM On 10/02/09 12:50, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Done via "git

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: ATI radeon fails with "iommu=soft swiotlb=force" (seen on RV730/RV740 and RS780/RS800) . Test commited for JF

2009-10-02 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On 10/02/09 12:50, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Done via "git pull" for another close enough "linux-2.6-xen" clone :- > # git pull > # git checkout xen/master > # git log > So you're saying it works? I didn't see anything bad in the dmesg output. If it is working, what does /proc/mtrr say? Thanks,

Re: [PATCH] r128: Add test for initialisation to all ioctls that require it

2009-08-30 Thread Dave Airlie
> Almost all r128's private ioctls require that the CCE state has > already been initialised. However, most do not test that this has > been done, and will proceed to dereference a null pointer. This may > result in a security vulnerability, since some ioctls are > unprivil

[Bug 21816] glean/vertProg1 test fails on some r300 and higher cards

2009-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21816 ajax at nwnk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Version|CVS |git --- Comment #4 from ajax a

[Bug 12095] Depth Test didn't work for glRasterPos3f() and glDrawPixels()

2009-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12095 ajax at nwnk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Version|CVS |git --- Comment #6 from ajax a

[Bug 8218] Errors during World of Warcraft "stress test"

2009-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8218 ajax at nwnk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Version|CVS |git --- Comment #20 from ajax a

[PATCH] r128: Add test for initialisation to all ioctls that require it

2009-08-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
Almost all r128's private ioctls require that the CCE state has already been initialised. However, most do not test that this has been done, and will proceed to dereference a null pointer. This may result in a security vulnerability, since some ioctls are unprivileged. This adds a macro fo

[PATCH 2/10] drivers/gpu/drm: Move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-07-19 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below the NULL test. In the case of drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c, the variable dev_priv whose initialization causes the problem is never used in the function, so it is dropped. Dropped some extra braces

[PATCH 2/5] drivers/gpu: Move a dereference below a NULL test

2009-07-11 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below the NULL test. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // @@ type T; expression E; identifier i,fld; statement S; @@ - T i = E->fld; +

[PATCH] drm/radeon: this VRAM vs aperture test is wrong, just remove it.

2009-06-18 Thread Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie Its quite valid to have VRAM < aperture size. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c |6 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c index 5225f5b..8f41f70 100644

[Bug 20053] _pbo_zcopy failure in pbo test

2009-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20053 zhao jian changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #3 from zhao jian

[Bug 21816] glean/vertProg1 test fails on some r300 and higher cards

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21816 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Cencora 2009-05-19 09:53:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Just FYI: I'm thinking of adding a -pedantic flag to glean and to make this > sub-test (and some others) depend on that flag. > >

[Bug 21816] glean/vertProg1 test fails on some r300 and higher cards

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21816 --- Comment #2 from Brian Paul 2009-05-19 09:16:24 PST --- Just FYI: I'm thinking of adding a -pedantic flag to glean and to make this sub-test (and some others) depend on that flag. The 0^0 case is unlikely to come up very oft

[Bug 21816] glean/vertProg1 test fails on some r300 and higher cards

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21816 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Cencora 2009-05-19 09:05:18 PST --- Created an attachment (id=26003) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=26003) LIT 0^0 fix -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=ema

[Bug 21816] New: glean/vertProg1 test fails on some r300 and higher cards

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21816 Summary: glean/vertProg1 test fails on some r300 and higher cards Product: Mesa Version: CVS Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority

[Bug 20053] _pbo_zcopy failure in pbo test

2009-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20053 Eric Anholt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 20053] _pbo_zcopy failure in pbo test

2009-02-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20053 --- Comment #1 from zhao jian 2009-02-11 02:17:43 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22805) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22805) xorg.0.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Bug 20053] New: _pbo_zcopy failure in pbo test

2009-02-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20053 Summary: _pbo_zcopy failure in pbo test Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority

[Bug 19667] [i915] Glean test/fbo render to 1D texture work incorrecly

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19667 Gordon Jin changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|e...@anholt.net |de...@li

[Bug 19667] [i915] Glean test/fbo render to 1D texture work incorrecly

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19667 --- Comment #2 from zhao jian 2009-01-20 19:58:51 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22122) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22122) test result of fbo -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?

[Bug 19667] [i915] Glean test/fbo render to 1D texture work incorrecly

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19667 --- Comment #1 from zhao jian 2009-01-20 19:58:05 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22121) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22121) xorg.0.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Bug 19667] New: [i915] Glean test/fbo render to 1D texture work incorrecly

2009-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19667 Summary: [i915] Glean test/fbo render to 1D texture work incorrecly Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW

[PATCH 2/13] drivers/gpu/drm/i915: Remove redundant test

2008-12-21 Thread Julia Lawall
; position p1,p2; @@ if (x...@p1 == NULL || ...) { ... when forall return ...; } ... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\) ( x...@p2 == NULL | x...@p2 != NULL ) // another path to the test that is not through p1? @s exists@ local idexpression r.x; position r

Re: [PATCH 2/13] drivers/gpu/drm/i915: Remove redundant test

2008-12-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 16:28 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > object_list is checked to be not NULL near the beginning of the function and > is not updated subsequently. > > A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as > follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/gpu/drm: Move a dereference below a NULL test

2008-12-20 Thread Julia Lawall
OK julia On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 08:35 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > From: Julia Lawall > > > > > > If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference shoul

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/gpu/drm: Move a dereference below a NULL test

2008-12-19 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 08:35 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > From: Julia Lawall > > > > If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below > > the NULL test. > > > > The semantic pat

Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/gpu/drm: Move a dereference below a NULL test

2008-12-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below > the NULL test. > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/).

[PATCH 1/3] drivers/gpu/drm: Move a dereference below a NULL test

2008-12-19 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall If the NULL test is necessary, then the dereference should be moved below the NULL test. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/). The result has been modified to move the initialization of driver down closer to where it

Test patch for non-MSI GM965 interrupt flood

2008-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
This patch skips the loop in the irq handler in non-MSI mode, with the thought that we never had IRQ floods before it was added. I've tested for 'a while' on my GM965 and haven't seen any problems, but I hadn't run the looping code before. If you're getting IRQs disabled, please give this a try an

[Bug 15825] [965] “vertattrib” fai led in Glean test

2008-05-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15825 --- Comment #2 from liuhaien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-08 00:11:04 PST --- it's ok when using the latest code. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug 15825] [965] “vertattrib” fai led in Glean test

2008-05-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15825 liuhaien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED -- Configure

[Bug 15825] [965] “vertattrib” fai led in Glean test

2008-05-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15825 liuhaien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug 15825] [965] “vertattrib” fai led in Glean test

2008-05-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15825 --- Comment #1 from haihao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-07 23:02:49 PST --- I can't reproduce it. Could you try the latest mesa code? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

  1   2   3   >