Moving libdrm out of drm.git seems like a good idea to me. Sure they
are different sides of the same coin but drm and libdrm should have
their own physical git repos. It makes things a little cleaner in my
eyes. It also makes things easier for git noobs.
-Ryan
On 2/28/09, vehemens wrote:
> On Sa
On Saturday 28 February 2009 05:28:38 am Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:54:21 -0800
>
> vehemens wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel,
On Saturday 28 February 2009 09:06:38 am Robert C. Noland III wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:54 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel,
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:54 -0800, vehemens wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal
> > > life leading to reduced time availability (
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:54:21 -0800
vehemens wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal
> > > life leading to reduced time availability
On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal
> > life leading to reduced time availability (except at 4am...) I'm going to
> > clarify the process for
On Friday 27 February 2009 01:40:25 pm Dave Airlie wrote:
> Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal life
> leading to reduced time availability (except at 4am...) I'm going to
> clarify the process for getting patches upstream now. (a...@amd also
> trialed this to get
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal life
> leading to reduced time availability (except at 4am...) I'm going to
> clarify the process for getting patches upstream now. (a...@amd also
> trialed this to get r60
Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal life
leading to reduced time availability (except at 4am...) I'm going to
clarify the process for getting patches upstream now. (a...@amd also
trialed this to get r600 upstream).
1. Apart from maybe minor changes I will no l
