On Friday, March 04, 2005 6:01 pm, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Paul Mackerras wrote:
Note that that check is also wrong for ppc64. I think it is going to
be wrong for most 64-bit platforms, since it is assuming that you can
never have ram at a higher physical address than any I/O devices.
Hi,
I upgraded drm (non core) to current cvs (previous one was from
2004-07-15) on an ia64 with a radeon 7000 (pci) and now on inserting the
module I get :
[drm:radeon_ati_pcigart_cleanup] *ERROR* no scatter/gather memory!
[drm:radeon_do_cleanup_cp] *ERROR* failed to cleanup PCI GART!
That's
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded drm (non core) to current cvs (previous one was from
2004-07-15) on an ia64 with a radeon 7000 (pci) and now on inserting
the module I get :
[drm:radeon_ati_pcigart_cleanup] *ERROR* no scatter/gather memory!
[drm:radeon_do_cleanup_cp] *ERROR* failed
* no scatter/gather memory!
[drm:radeon_do_cleanup_cp] *ERROR* failed to cleanup PCI GART!
Ok, it looks like drm cvs (core and non core) has been broken on ia64
since august. Patch attached.
What is this code trying to do anyway? It looks like it's checking for
overflow and trying to make sure
] *ERROR* no scatter/gather memory!
[drm:radeon_do_cleanup_cp] *ERROR* failed to cleanup PCI GART!
Ok, it looks like drm cvs (core and non core) has been broken on ia64
since august. Patch attached.
What is this code trying to do anyway? It looks like it's checking for
overflow and trying to make sure
On Friday, March 4, 2005 10:31 am, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Seems like we need something like this instead?
Index: linux-core/drm_dma.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/dri/drm/linux-core/drm_dma.c,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -r1.39
Stephane Marchesin writes:
Ok, it looks like drm cvs (core and non core) has been broken on ia64
since august. Patch attached.
Stephane
Index: linux/drm_bufs.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/dri/drm/linux/drm_bufs.h,v
retrieving
Paul Mackerras wrote:
Note that that check is also wrong for ppc64. I think it is going to
be wrong for most 64-bit platforms, since it is assuming that you can
never have ram at a higher physical address than any I/O devices. On
64-bit platforms it is quite common to have some ram and some I/O
