Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:31:28 +0100 Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com wrote: On 28.2.2009 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote: KMS support is not a feature of the server but of your 2D driver. You want 2.6.2, or things will be bad. I have 2.5.0. After turning KMS off, problem seems to be solved.

Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:31:28 +0100 Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com wrote: On 28.2.2009 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote: KMS support is not a feature of the server but of your 2D driver. You want 2.6.2, or things will be bad. I have

[Bug 7770] PCI domain mismatch between X server and kernel, leaving clients unable to use direct rendering

2009-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7770 --- Comment #39 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2009-02-28 02:39:42 PST --- (In reply to comment #38) The bad news is that it's highly unstable. I mean, you can query information with glxinfo without a problem, but don't try a GL

[Bug 19484] corruption in Dolphin when moving the mouse

2009-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19484 --- Comment #13 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2009-02-28 03:38:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) Instead, Option ExaOptimizeMigration off does solve it. What's the drawback in disabling this? Potentially lower performance due

[Bug 19484] corruption in Dolphin when moving the mouse

2009-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19484 --- Comment #14 from Mikko C. mikko@gmail.com 2009-02-28 04:47:26 PST --- So I'm guessing there's no real solution yet? Beside disabling that option. Should I close this bug? -- Configure bugmail:

Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:49:06PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 27.2.2009 14:04, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:32:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:28:51 +0100 Jiri Slabyjirisl...@gmail.com wrote: everytime I run X, it gets stuck. Currently running

Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 28.2.2009 01:20, Eric Anholt wrote: KMS support is not a feature of the server but of your 2D driver. You want 2.6.2, or things will be bad. I have 2.5.0. After turning KMS off, problem seems to be solved. Anyway, I would appreciate a version of the intel driver being in the Kconfig text,

[Bug 19484] corruption in Dolphin when moving the mouse

2009-02-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19484 --- Comment #15 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2009-02-28 05:06:29 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) Should I close this bug? Not until the bug has been found and fixed. -- Configure bugmail:

Re: changes to upstreaming process for Linux code.

2009-02-28 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:54:21 -0800 vehemens vehem...@verizon.net wrote: On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal life leading

Re: changes to upstreaming process for Linux code.

2009-02-28 Thread Robert C. Noland III
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:54 -0800, vehemens wrote: On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Prompted by how well it worked with Intel, and changes in my personal life leading to reduced time

Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: The kernel deadlocked on struct_mutex, did it not? That's a kernel bug regardless of what userspace you're running. No, it didn't deadlock on struct_mutex, it deadlocked because the hardware got wedged, and we still don't know how to

Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Bruno Prémont
On Sat, 28 February 2009 Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote: On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: The kernel deadlocked on struct_mutex, did it not? That's a kernel bug regardless of what userspace you're running. Do we know why this happened? Userland went stomping

Re: changes to upstreaming process for Linux code.

2009-02-28 Thread vehemens
On Saturday 28 February 2009 09:06:38 am Robert C. Noland III wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:54 -0800, vehemens wrote: On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Prompted by how well it worked with

Re: changes to upstreaming process for Linux code.

2009-02-28 Thread vehemens
On Saturday 28 February 2009 05:28:38 am Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:54:21 -0800 vehemens vehem...@verizon.net wrote: On Friday 27 February 2009 01:45:50 pm Kristian Høgsberg wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Prompted by how

Re: i915 X lockup

2009-02-28 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 19:24 +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote: On Sat, 28 February 2009 Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote: On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 00:47 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: The kernel deadlocked on struct_mutex, did it not? That's a kernel bug regardless of what userspace you're running.

Re: changes to upstreaming process for Linux code.

2009-02-28 Thread Ryan Hope
Moving libdrm out of drm.git seems like a good idea to me. Sure they are different sides of the same coin but drm and libdrm should have their own physical git repos. It makes things a little cleaner in my eyes. It also makes things easier for git noobs. -Ryan On 2/28/09, vehemens