On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 16:00 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:08:16AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> > Just one more question, is that patch going to be merged or should I
>> > resubmit
>> > it as a series of one patc
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> I am fixing the bug entry , https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60461.
> This entry states that we are not checking the skb allocated in
> fw_download_code
> for NULL and after checking it ,I fixed it to check for the NULL value be
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Mon Aug 11 14, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> I am fixing the bug entry ,
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60461.
>> This entry states that we are not checking the skb allocated in
>> fw_download_code
>> and after checking I
Thanks Randy for checking this I am going to resend as a v2 patch.
Regards Nick
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/11/14 12:18, Nick Krause wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Randy for your help otherwise is my patch good? Please let me
>> known if there
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/11/14 11:55, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 08/11/14 11:26, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Randy Dunlap
>>>> w
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/11/14 11:26, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 08/11/14 11:04, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Nicholas Krause
>>>&
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/11/14 11:04, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>> I am fixing the bug entry ,
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60461.
>>> This entry sta
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> I am fixing the bug entry , https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60461.
> This entry states that we are not checking the skb allocated in
> fw_download_code
> and after checking I fixed it to check for the NULL value before using th
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/25/2014 11:30 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/25/2014 11:13 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/25/2014 11:13 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/25/2014 10:53 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/25/2014 10:53 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/25/2014 10:20 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/25/2014 10:20 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>
>>> Excuse me, I did not see the patch details, but I guess it is about
>>> whether welcome
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> Excuse me, I did not see the patch details, but I guess it is about
> whether welcome a new member to upstream kernel. For me, I have 3 ideas
> about it if I am a newbie or a normal kernel developer:
>
> - Do I have enough basic skills for it
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Richard Weinberger
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>> Steve,
>>> I have programming a lot in other areas just not the kernel.
>>> You a
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> Steve,
>> I have programming a lot in other areas just not the kernel.
>> You are right through I need to test my code better through.
>
> Nick,
>
&
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:30:51 -0700
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:50:31 -0400
>> > Nick Krause wrote:
>>
>>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Nick Krause writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> Nick Krause writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>>> Steve
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Nick Krause writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> Steven Rostedt writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:47:25 -0400
>>>> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Steven Rostedt writes:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:47:25 -0400
>> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>>> The three parameters are the number of elements, the size of each individual
>>> element, and then finally the flags used on how to allocate tha
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> Hey Greg and others.
>> Sorry for another email but it seems the function,
>> ion_carveout_heap_unmap_dma is
>> just returning and not doing anything useful. F
Hey Greg and others.
Sorry for another email but it seems the function,
ion_carveout_heap_unmap_dma is
just returning and not doing anything useful. Furthermore I am new so
I don't known how
to write this function but this may be causing some rather serious
bugs as if the dma heap
is not unmaped
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:09:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 01:26:52AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> > This patch add a atomic lock in usb_tranzport_usb for preventing
>> > a tiny race in this function.
>> >
>
Is this patch being merged or is this not an issue. I am confused
did I make a mistake in my patch or is there being a different
patch being merged.
Thank Nick
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 22:26 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> Thanks for the
Thanks for the feedback I will resend the patch fixed.
Otherwise please use Larry's idea.
Cheers Nick
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 22:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:56:50PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> > Rewrites the
This patch is old I thought I fixed it and resent.
Cheers Nick
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:29 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmw
Our you Guys just removing me from your emails I have checked this patch
and it seems right. If you don't want to accept it , the less you can
do is give me a reply.
Nick
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> If anyone able to check this patch it would be great.
>
If anyone able to check this patch it would be great.
Thanks Nick
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Checks for Null return from dev_skb_alloc if it returns Null,
> fw_download returns false. Otherwise it returns true.Also
> removed rt_status due to returning true of false
Thanks Joe,
I need to read my patches more carefully.
Nick :)
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 16:20 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>> So Sorry about wasting your time with bad patchs.
>> I feel bad about that. I hope this
Hey Guys,
So Sorry about wasting your time with bad patchs.
I feel bad about that. I hope this patch is O.K.
now. :(
Nicholas Krause
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Checks for Null return from dev_skb_alloc if it returns Null,
> fw_download returns false. Otherwise it re
Hey guys,
Sorry about no reply,
my power supply died last night,
have to get a new one. I will be RMAing
the old old in order to get a packup in
case this PSU dies.
Cheers Nick
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:24:41PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrot
So sorry Greg,
I pulled the git in this morning for kernel-3.16-r2 ,I will resend the
patch from the clean tree.
I will also fix the tabs.'
Sorry :( Nick
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:53:00PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas K
Hey Fellow Developers,
This is my first patch so if there are any errors please reply as i will
fix them. Below is the patch.
-- drivers/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.h.orig 2014-06-11 22:50:29.339671939
-0400
+++ drivers/vme/bridges/vme_ca91cx42.h 2014-06-11 23:15:36.027685173 -0400
@@ -526,7
32 matches
Mail list logo
