Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 08:00:49PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Tue 08-03-16 20:01:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > > Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 08:00:49PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 08-03-16 20:01:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for two purposes.
> > > > One
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 08-03-16 20:01:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for two purposes.
> > > One is to remember processes killed by LMK, and the other is to
> > >
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 08-03-16 20:01:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for two purposes.
> > One is to remember processes killed by LMK, and the other is to
> > accelerate termination of processes
On Tue 08-03-16 20:01:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for two purposes.
> One is to remember processes killed by LMK, and the other is to
> accelerate termination of processes killed by LMK.
>
> But since LMK is invoked as a memory shrinker function,
Currently, lowmemorykiller (LMK) is using TIF_MEMDIE for two purposes.
One is to remember processes killed by LMK, and the other is to
accelerate termination of processes killed by LMK.
But since LMK is invoked as a memory shrinker function, there still
should be some memory available. It is very
