On 2015년 10월 23일 16:52, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
In addition, the function parameter names will be wilc
for the variable of struct wilc.
The "wl" is local variable naming as well.
So if it is a parameter it is wilc but if it is a local va
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
> In addition, the function parameter names will be wilc
> for the variable of struct wilc.
>
> The "wl" is local variable naming as well.
So if it is a parameter it is wilc but if it is a local variable then it
is wl? That seems like an
On 2015년 10월 23일 15:57, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:28:21PM +0900, Glen Lee wrote:
This patch add new argument wilc to wilc_handle_isr and pass wilc to
the function.
It's not important enough to redo the patch but why are we sometimes
using "wl" and sometimes "wilc"?
We
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:28:21PM +0900, Glen Lee wrote:
> This patch add new argument wilc to wilc_handle_isr and pass wilc to
> the function.
It's not important enough to redo the patch but why are we sometimes
using "wl" and sometimes "wilc"?
regards,
dan carpenter
__
This patch add new argument wilc to wilc_handle_isr and pass wilc to
the function.
It is void type for now because wilc_wlan.c was implemented platform
independently at the beginning (linux_wlan.c is implementation of LINUX part)
so the struct wilc header file cannot be included at this moment,
but
