On Tuesday 10 September 2013 22:54:44 Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
This patch seems to combine two things -- register access rework AND
adjustment of the driver for MX23 touchscreen.
It reworks the register access to avoid the
Hi Marek,
On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote:
Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC at
least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert j...@pengutronix.de
CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
CC:
Dear Juergen Beisert,
Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC at
least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert j...@pengutronix.de
CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
CC: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
CC: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
CC:
Hi Marek,
On Tuesday 10 September 2013 10:22:36 Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote:
Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC
at least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert
Dear Dan Carpenter,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
This patch seems to combine two things -- register access rework AND
adjustment of the driver for MX23 touchscreen.
It reworks the register access to avoid the i.MX23/i.MX28 runtime
decision all over
Dear Jürgen Beisert,
Hi Marek,
On Tuesday 10 September 2013 10:22:36 Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote:
Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both
SoC at least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
Signed-off-by:
Dear Jürgen Beisert,
Hi Marek,
On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote:
Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC
at least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert j...@pengutronix.de
CC:
Hi Dan,
On Wednesday 04 September 2013 16:27:39 Dan Carpenter wrote:
[...]
ACTUALLY! When I look at it now the third argument is almost always
set, clear or toggle.
So we could do:
static inline void lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val,
size_t
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series of
SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this new style will be accepted?
My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as what Marek said
about
Dear Dan Carpenter,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series
of SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this new style will be
accepted?
My lradc_plate_mask() is basically the same idea as
10 matches
Mail list logo
