Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2002-02-25 Thread Dave Bryson
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, bob mcwhirter wrote: As far as references, there are several commercial vendors, all of which use rules somewhow: cysive.com (Their cymbio platform has a simple rules-engine that doesn't take advantage of RETE). savvion.com (I think they have a true

Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2002-02-24 Thread bob mcwhirter
I was just reading the Drool mailing list and came across a posting on workflow. I was wondering if anyone had started an effort on a workflow engine. I think Jason van Zyl was originally planning on doing it, and I was hoping to assist. As far as I know, thus far, nothing has been done.

Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2001-12-13 Thread James Strachan
Hey Jason - Original Message - From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I am very interested in making a workflow engine (as I'm sure others on this list are interested in doing) and I wanted to know if anything has started in earnest based on drools? I've a couple commercial

Re: [droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2001-12-13 Thread Stuart Schmukler
Jason, Workflow engines are interesting. It has been my observation that A number of the approaches to design workflow engines in a rules language are simplified with the idea of time in the rules engine at the condition evaluation level. For example, in a semi-english syntax: // Monitoring

[droolers] WorkFlow Engine

2001-12-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I am very interested in making a workflow engine (as I'm sure others on this list are interested in doing) and I wanted to know if anything has started in earnest based on drools? I've a couple commercial packages that look really neat: http://www.dralasoft.com/products/workflow/index.html