RE: the complete rebuild of the existing DSpace/DSpace GitHub.
I'm also OK with rebuilding it entirely (and re-mapping all SVN users -
GitHub Users). However, I agree with Peter Dietz, that we should rename
the existing DSpace/DSpace to DSpace/DSpace-pre-official (or perhaps
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Peter Dietz pdiet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Since we're now ready to migrate all of the remainder code to GitHub, two
questions have popped up.
1) Should we stick with the existing Github.com/dspace/dspace repository,
or should we reimport (a fresh git
As I thought about this a bit more, I did somewhat have a change of heart,
and kind of think we ought to properly redo it.
Imagine when DSpace migrates to xyz-version-control in a decade. We'll all
be emeritus, and wondering where our place in history is. And the future
people migrating the code
Hi All,
Since we're now ready to migrate all of the remainder code to GitHub, two
questions have popped up.
1) Should we stick with the existing Github.com/dspace/dspace repository,
or should we reimport (a fresh git svn clone) so that we can use the author
mapping to make old commits point to a
