On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:01 AM, TAYLOR Robin wrote:
> >
> > I'm looking into XMLGregorianCalendar as well -- I wouldn't
> > say DCDate "revolves" around java.util.Date so much. It is
> > often constructed from a Date object, and can return one but
> > the private calendar objects which are storin
: Mark Diggory [mailto:mdigg...@atmire.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 3:38 a.m.
> > To: TAYLOR Robin
> > Cc: dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Dspace-devel] DCDate conversation
> >
> > Yes, I'm just reiterating my position in the threa
>
> Kim
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Diggory [mailto:mdigg...@atmire.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 3:38 a.m.
>> To: TAYLOR Robin
>> Cc: dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Dspace-devel] DCDate conversation
>
lems with granularity, display and so on for 1.6.1
and then go from there. Happy to hear counterpoints!
Cheers,
Kim
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Diggory [mailto:mdigg...@atmire.com]
> Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 3:38 a.m.
> To: TAYLOR Robin
> Cc: dspace-devel@lis
Yes, I'm just reiterating my position in the thread. I've used
XMLgregorianCalendar in other places (dspace-rdf) and it meets the ISO
spec and DCMI guidelines for dates. We should use standard JVM tools
when they are better than ours.
Mark
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:07 AM, TAYLOR Robin wrote:
>
I hope nobody minds but I'm interested in continuing the conversation that I
was only able to pay partial attention to in yesterday's developer meeting
http://duraspace.org/irclogs/index.php?date=2010-04-28. Am I correct in
understanding that we would be looking to replace the current functional
