Andrew Marlow wrote:
The one I would like to use is the one from 2004. AFAIK that is the latest.
Then I'd suggest talking to OCLC. They can let you know if you need
permission for the use you have in mind, and what that would involve.
I see from a later post that you've found the contact
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:04 PM, John Mark Ockerbloom
ocker...@pobox.upenn.edu wrote:
Andrew Marlow wrote:
Your web site is great. Yes, the subject hierachy you have is the sort of
thing I am after. I did not see the traditional breadcums that show the
hierarchy though. You have opted for
Andrew Marlow wrote:
This is fantastic. I want it!
Thanks. I'll note the support when I propose working more on
it next year... :-)
Hmm. Whilst your link shows some great categorization, stuff local to
Penn might be a problem when it comes to international systems (I am in
the UK).
Let
I have found there is a copy of the Dewey Decimal system in project
gutenberg at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12513/12513-h/12513-h.htm. The
release date is 4th June 2004. I am not sure if this is the release date of
the gutenberg file or of the actual Dewey Decimal document itself I know
that
Andrew Marlow wrote:
I have found there is a copy of the Dewey Decimal system in project
gutenberg at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12513/12513-h/12513-h.htm.
The release date is 4th June 2004. I am not sure if this is the release
date of the gutenberg file or of the actual Dewey Decimal
Andrew Marlow wrote:
Your web site is great. Yes, the subject hierachy you have is the sort
of thing I am after. I did not see the traditional breadcums that show
the hierarchy though. You have opted for saying 'broader' or 'narrower'
classification.
Yes, because LC subject headings
6 matches
Mail list logo
