Re: [Dspam-devel] More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine

2013-01-07 Thread Troy Ayers
Could I trouble you for a sanitized version of your /usr/site/dspam_train/bin/dspam_fp script? My system is Linux/sendmail/procmail. Hate to re-invent the wheel... I'm having trouble envisioning how I would verify success or failure of delivery by DSPAM. Does it involve checking the users

Re: [Dspam-devel] More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine

2013-01-07 Thread Troy Ayers
indeed! Another scenario: Customer opts of dspam. Purge signature & token data for the account... But leave the quarantine intact (we have a cron job to purged old messages). But then you can't recover messages from the quarantine with the web gui, as you will encounter the behavior below.

[Dspam-devel] More patches for dspam.cgi: delivery of false positives from quarantine

2013-01-07 Thread Tod A. Sandman
Here is another patch for dspam.cgi that deals with the delivery of false positives from the quarantine. It is a patch on top of the recent quarantine file locking patch I submitted. It allows for specifying in configure.pl an external command for delivering false positives. If this command i

Re: [Dspam-devel] Patches for dspam.cgi

2013-01-07 Thread Troy Ayers
So far, it doesn't seem to introduce any expected behavior. As to seeing if it does what it's supposed to do, that will take some time. I've never experienced total quarantine loss, just reports of lost email when retraining 2 more more messages from the history tab. Seems to not be easily rep

Re: [Dspam-devel] Patches for dspam.cgi

2013-01-07 Thread Stevan Bajić
On 07.01.2013 22:23, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 07-01-13 20:34, Tod A. Sandman wrote: >>> Did the patch you submitted get merged in the official dspam.cgi? >>> >> I never received a reply, so I assume not. >> > Hi Hello, > It's not that we are ungrateful, just the fact that there are not many > deve

Re: [Dspam-devel] Patches for dspam.cgi

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 07-01-13 20:34, Tod A. Sandman wrote: >> Did the patch you submitted get merged in the official dspam.cgi? >> > > I never received a reply, so I assume not. > Hi It's not that we are ungrateful, just the fact that there are not many developers actively working on DSPAM. Another problem is th

Re: [Dspam-devel] Patches for dspam.cgi

2013-01-07 Thread Tod A. Sandman
> Did the patch you submitted get merged in the official dspam.cgi? > I never received a reply, so I assume not. Tod Sandman Sr. Systems Administrator Middleware Development & Integration Rice University Voice: 713.348.5816 --

Re: [Dspam-devel] Patches for dspam.cgi

2013-01-07 Thread Troy Ayers
Did the patch you submitted get merged in the official dspam.cgi? -Troy On 12/10/2012 3:37 PM, Tod A. Sandman wrote: > And here's the patch. > > > Tod Sandman > Sr. Systems Administrator > Middleware Development & Integration > Rice University > ---