On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:34:19 +0200
Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 17:38:38 +0100
> Martin Wheldon wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> Hello Martin,
>
>
> > I've been following this thread with extreme interest as I am
> > currently designing a solution containing DSPAM. After reading and re
> >
On Fri, 7 May 2010 17:38:38 +0100
Martin Wheldon wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello Martin,
> I've been following this thread with extreme interest as I am
> currently designing a solution containing DSPAM. After reading and re
> reading the README I hadn't realised that the following was possible.
>
> > L
On Fri, 7 May 2010 23:58:20 +0800
Michael Alger wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> >
> > Look. I am not the one against everything in a db. For me DB is
> > fine. The only thing that is bothering me is that so far no one
> > has done serious work on DSPAM in
About offtopic... yes it is :-) but not really. We have some brands for our
application hosting which are online.
But good to see zackbummfertig.de is fully up
--
___
Dspam-u
>Look. I am not the one against everything in a db. For me DB is fine. The
only thing that is bothering me is that so far no one has done serious work
on DSPAM in the last months beside me. Every one >keeps talking, talking,
promissing, talking and at the end everything is hitting me.
>Remember the
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
> Look. I am not the one against everything in a db. For me DB is
> fine. The only thing that is bothering me is that so far no one
> has done serious work on DSPAM in the last months beside me. Every
> one keeps talking, talking, pro
Am 07.05.2010 17:14, schrieb Stevan Bajić:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 16:55:12 +0200
> "imposit.com - Webmaster" wrote:
>
>
>>> [...]
>>>
Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of
>> suExec for the
>>
WebGUI.
On Fri, 7 May 2010 16:55:12 +0200
"imposit.com - Webmaster" wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of
> suExec for the
> > > WebGUI.
> > >
> > The WebGUI is actually doing two things:
> > 1) reading data from DSPAM_HOME
> > 2) executing
>
> [...]
> > Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of
suExec for the
> > WebGUI.
> >
> The WebGUI is actually doing two things:
> 1) reading data from DSPAM_HOME
> 2) executing the dspam binary
>
> To avoid suExec for (1) you need to have ALL data in the databas
On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:38:17 -0500
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:11:50PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 May 2010 00:32:14 +0200
> > Stevan Baji?? wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Btw, I'm stas on irc in #dspam. Lurking most of the time, maybe
> > > > > > I should ask th
Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 08:44:47 (-0500), Kenneth Marshall a écrit :
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:44:47 -0500
> From: Kenneth Marshall
> To: Julien Valroff
> Cc: Stevan Baji?? , dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers
>
> On Fri
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:13:34PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> >
> > We run the web server as the same user as we run DSPAM as a trusted user
> > to avoid both (1) and (2). It works very well and no suExec needed.
>
> That is unfortunately not possible for the Debian package (that is my concer
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:11:50PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 00:32:14 +0200
> Stevan Baji?? wrote:
>
> > > > > Btw, I'm stas on irc in #dspam. Lurking most of the time, maybe
> > > > > I should ask there if somebody hangs on irc?
> > > > >
> > > > Ion-Mihai is hanging
On Fri, 7 May 2010 15:13:34 +0200
Julien Valroff wrote:
[...]
> That is unfortunately not possible for the Debian package (that is my concern
> about
> suExec)
>
suExec can (and is) a pain but that pain is because of the additional security
you get when you limit the user who can run the WebU
On Fri, 7 May 2010 16:11:50 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> No, no :) I could kill you for "fix a bug" commit logs, but given that
> you are the one that fixes them, I don't dare :)
>
I don't know when I started with that... but when I look at the CHANGELOG and
at the commit log then I see that
Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 14:51:37 (+0200), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:51:37 +0200
> From: Stevan Bajić
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:37:49 +0200
> Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 08:03:18 (-0500), Kenneth Marshall a écrit :
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:03:18 -0500
> From: Kenneth Marshall
> To: Stevan Baji??
> Cc: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers
>
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:41:15PM +0300, Stas Su??cov wrote:
> > >
> > > I also don't know about anything similar I described as an Anti-Spam
> > > solution.
> > >
> >
> > This sounds like something that can easily be addressed by running multiple
> > DSPAM instances on the anti-spam server,
On Fri, 7 May 2010 00:32:14 +0200
Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > > > Btw, I'm stas on irc in #dspam. Lurking most of the time, maybe
> > > > I should ask there if somebody hangs on irc?
> > > >
> > > Ion-Mihai is hanging there. And he is sure already sharpening his
> > > Release Manager knife to kill
On Fri, 7 May 2010 23:00:09 +1000
John Kenyon wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch]
> Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 6:34 PM
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Notifications not working
>
> > But you get in debug log the tex
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:51:37PM +0200, Stevan Baji?? wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:37:49 +0200
> Julien Valroff wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of
> > suExec for the
> > WebGUI.
> >
> The WebGUI is actually doing two things:
> 1) r
-Original Message-
From: John Kenyon
Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 11:00 PM
To: 'Stevan Bajić'
Subject: RE: [Dspam-user] Notifications not working
-Original Message-
From: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch]
Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 6:34 PM
To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subje
On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:37:49 +0200
Julien Valroff wrote:
[...]
> Well, both, though you are right, my first thoughts were for the use of
> suExec for the
> WebGUI.
>
The WebGUI is actually doing two things:
1) reading data from DSPAM_HOME
2) executing the dspam binary
To avoid suExec for (1)
Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 14:20:41 (+0200), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:20:41 +0200
> From: Stevan Bajić
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:15:54 +0200
> Julien Valroff
On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:15:54 +0200
Julien Valroff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 14:07:51 (+0200), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> > Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:07:51 +0200
> > From: Stevan Bajić
> > To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for
Hi,
Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 14:07:51 (+0200), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:07:51 +0200
> From: Stevan Bajić
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM centralized setup for several MX servers
[...]
> There is no right/wrong in that regard. If
On Fri, 7 May 2010 13:05:18 +0200
"imposit.com - Webmaster" wrote:
> Ahm, Just a Question :-)
>
Martin! Warum bin ich NICHT überrascht von Dir eine Antwort auf diesen thread
zu bekommen? Why? Why am I not surprised to get you responding? :) :)
> From my Point of View there should be no Proble
Ahm, Just a Question :-)
From my Point of View there should be no Problem with using the same DB - i
mean why should be .. since it should make absolute no difference ifo ne or
more applications write to the same tablespace
So the only 2 things are more Problematic are
1. user and group administ
On Fri, 07 May 2010 13:41:15 +0300
Stas Sușcov wrote:
[...]
> > This sounds like something that can easily be addressed by running multiple
> > DSPAM instances on the anti-spam server, one for each MX. They can use the
> > same DB backend. Then each MX would need to deliver to the appropriate
> >
În data de Jo, 06-05-2010 la 21:03 -0500, Kenneth Marshall a scris:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:05:57AM +0300, Stas Su??cov wrote:
> > ??n data de Vi, 07-05-2010 la 00:32 +0200, Stevan Baji?? a scris:
> > > On Fri, 07 May 2010 01:18:25 +0300
> > > Stas Su??cov wrote:
> >
> > > > Thanks a lot for
On Fri, 7 May 2010 18:18:56 +1000
John Kenyon wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch]
> Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 5:11 PM
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Notifications not working
>
> > And after that you got /var/dspam
-Original Message-
From: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch]
Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 5:11 PM
To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Notifications not working
> And after that you got /var/dspam/data/domain.com/username created. Right?
> Can you now again execut
On Fri, 7 May 2010 09:00:02 +1000
John Kenyon wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch]
> Sent: Friday, 7 May 2010 8:41 AM
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Notifications not working
>
> > Okay. I have seen enough. Here co
33 matches
Mail list logo
