river to
DSPAM.
SpamAssassin recently did this and the performance is incredible and I
think it would be a great addition to DSPAM.
Anyone interested?
Kind regards,
Steve.
--
___
On 04/12/14 01:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 03.12.2014 um 11:39 schrieb Steve Freegard:
>> If you're willing to spend the time to learn it and get your hands dirty
>> a bit, then DSPAM is well worth the effort IMO. It's way faster than
>> SpamAssassin (due to t
I'm not a C coder and the actual core of DSPAM works pretty
damn well for me as it is. The only thing I'd like to see is some
additional storage modules (e.g. Redis) and improving log output when
trying to debug issues as that IMO is the worst part of DSPAM as it is
at the
y I wouldn't use TEFT; I'm using TOE here. Which tokenizer are
you using? OSB?
Do you have any training left? e.g. run dspam_stats -H -S
myem...@mydomain.tld
Regards,
Steve.
--
Rapidly troubleshoot probl
On 26/11/13 10:49, ML mail wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Yes I have been training dspam with these messages by moving them into
> my Spam folder which automatically retrains dspam. I did this more than
> 100 of these kind of spam mails but without any success.
>
Which tokenizer are y
ave you been training DSPAM on these messages as spam?
Regards,
Steve.
--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline
em. I'm using virtual users - and if the user doesn't
already exist, then --classify fails and dspam logs a "received invalid
result (!DSR_ISSPAM && !DSR_ISINNOCENT) -2" to the logs.
Is this a bug? If the virtual user doesn't exist - shouldn
want the anti-virus and
> not the anti-spam.
>
> Is there a way in dspam to activate the anti-virus but not the anti-spam?
>
>
Don't use dspam then. Clam can be run in numerous ways without using dspam.
Steve
---
From: Paul Cockings
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:57 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>How is your DSPAM installation? Are you achieving a higher
accuracy now? Did changing to T
- Original Message -
> From: Robert
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:11 PM
> Subject: [Dspam-user] sendmail, dspam, dovecot LDA how?
>
> I now want to use sieve filters, with our dovecot server this requires
> me to use dovecot as an LDA, i
- Original Message -
> From: Chad M Stewart
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:38 PM
> Subject: [Dspam-user] SIEVE like filtering logic, does this sound reasonable?
>
>
> I want to implement a sieve type filter, after dspam has processed the
- Original Message -
> From: Chad M Stewart
> To: Stevan Bajić
> Cc: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 9:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of
> spam/non-spam
>
>
> I've been around email for years and I don't like the
- Original Message -
> From: Stevan Bajić
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 2:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of
> spam/non-spam
>
> On 01.05.2012 1
>> Figure Outlook users can simply forward the message to the address and
> then the signature should be present in the body. Being a user preference
> they
> can easily change it if they desire. (Assuming I've given them an interface
> to do so.)
> This is where I have a problem. Forwa
- Original Message -
> From: Marko Weber
> To: Dspam User
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 4:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of
> spam/non-spam
>
>
> Mr Fatula, yes you are right with dovecot-antispam, just move mail and
> all is okay.
> B
- Original Message -
> From: Chad M Stewart
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 9:46 PM
> Subject: [Dspam-user] Training -- a single address instead of spam/non-spam
>
>
> I'd like to come up with a way where my users can forward mis-classified
So, trying to make the latest Macports portfile for the latest dspam. Got it
working, except, when I upgrade the port, it overlays dspam.conf. Is there a
way to prevent an upgrade of dspam from killing the users dspam.conf?
I don't see any doc in README, except, refer to UPGRADING. In that file,
From: Chad M Stewart
>To: Stevan Bajić
>Cc: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>
>> 3) Now go on and train with dspam_train: dspam_train SpamHitRate
>> [spam_corpus maildir or mbox] [nonspam_corpu
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Which was to be expected. TEFT is an evil relict from the past.
>>>
>>>
But it's the default! That makes no logical sense to me that the devs w
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 2:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>That is correct, as I had mentioned, I did not have a lot of HAM to train with.
At least you have around 33K Ham messages. This is not that bad
I should also note that during dspam_train runs, it was sprinkled with "BROKEN
RESULT" messages instead of pass or fail. Not many of them, but, some.
Looking at the newgroup history, I really did not find a good explantion for
these. Does anyone know what they mean, with MySQL backend?
I am us
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 2:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>From all the 633K messages you processed you only had 70 falsely
classified as Spam while you had 5629 falsely classified as Ham.
This
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:39 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>
>3) Now go on and train with dspam_train: dspam_train SpamHitRate
[spam_corpus maildir or mbox] [nonspam_corpus maildir or mbox]
>
>After
From: Tom Fernandes
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 4:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] retraining not working (bailing on error 22)
>
>
>>
>>
>> What happens when you:
>>
>> select count(*) from dspam.dspam_signature_data where signature =
>> "4f8f82b415
From: Tom Fernandes
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 1:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] retraining not working (bailing on error 22)
>
>
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I want to retrain false negatives using
>> >
>> >dspam --source=error --class=spam --user tom \
>>
From: Tom Fernandes
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:07 AM
>Subject: [Dspam-user] retraining not working (bailing on error 22)
>
>Hi,
>
>I want to retrain false negatives using
>
>dspam --source=error --class=spam --user tom \
>--signature=4f8f82b415657
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>It does not indicate any wrong doing from your part. But considering your
>statement that spam is not well captured and looking at the amount
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
>Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:49 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>Spam: 1.391985007296783157922995792876 %
>Ham: 98.608014992703216842077004207124 %
>
>This is crazy. You have about 70 times more Ham tokens
hem
>>through dspam_train as spam, and simply go from there? (I understand the
>>merged group portion I think, have never used one yet though). So, I could do
>>this for all users who participated in training so that th
From: Stevan Bajić
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>This is not good. But the above data is not that horrible. Anyway... allow me
>to ask you a bunch of questions:
>1) When you get a FN or a FP
From: Bradley Giesbrecht
>To: Steve Fatula
>Cc: Dspam List
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:04 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
>
>
>I can't help you other then to point out that you may have missed the two
>replies prior to the one yo
>On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need it, the checks
>that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough for those users to receive
>a very low level of spam. DSPAM is used for some troublesome accounts or
>those that want/can handle training a filter.
>
>That's gre
From: Nathanael Noblet
>To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 8:12 PM
>Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam ending in daemon mode
>
>Not sure if you are aware but dspam is in the epel repos for
>CentOS/RHEL. Are you using that build? If you aren't is there a reason
An addendum to what I just wrote... I changed to the user instead of using sudo
to run spam with no fork, and, it ends with one additional line - segmentation
fault.
So, the end of the debug is:
30657: [01/22/2012 15:59:50] find attribute 'Home'
30657: [01/22/2012 15:59:50] -> found attribute
ble-long-usernames --enable-virtual-users --with-dspam-owner=dspam
--with-dspam-home-owner=dspam --with-dspam-home-group=postfix
--with-dspam-mode=4511 --with-logfile=/var/dspam/log/dspam.log
--with-dspam-group=postfix --with-storage-driver=mysql_drv
--with-mysql-libraries=/usr/$libdir/mysql
- Original Message -
> From: Tom Hendrikx
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 4:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Signature location enhancement request
>
> This way of solving your issue is very opaque to users. They want
> something to hap
ripts would never move the message to the spam
folder.
So many systems are configured this way, but, then one has to find a way to
code around pop users. If the location was not in the header, nothing to do.
Steve
--
Ma
> From: Julien Vehent
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] How to know if retraining is working
>
> Quoting myself
> http://wiki.linuxwall.info/doku.php/en:ressources:dossiers:dspam
> Read "8 Test Procedure"
>
I used DSPAM many years ago, and, have gone back to it again. I am using
dovecot-antispam (well, version 2 for dovecot 2) to do the re-training. Thus
far, I have learned 59 spam, most of which are very similar in nature. My
recollection was that DSPAM learned very quickly, but this is not happen
It already does post timestamps. Based on your log record, it was at Fri Jul 22
01:39:22 CDT 2011
I got this via the first field in your log file, and the command:
date -d @1311316762
Steve
--
10 Tips for Better Web
and simply deliver to
the inbox.
Is it really supposed to be in both the header and body when set to message?
Steve
--
10 Tips for Better Web Security
Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered in
never did it.
So, both points listed in the Postfix doc are very appealing to me. If someone
has such a config, all I would need is the master.cf relevant sections. If not,
will have to hack away at it until it works. I was just surprised no one had
documented such a setup, at least
Looking for a master.cf file showing how you set this up as an advanced content
filter. Not the simple one, nor the one found in the dspam readme files for
postfix. I have been unable to find any anywhere on the interner, all the
examples use the simple content filter method.
Steve
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:20:47 +0200
> Von: salson.uma...@monecam.com
> An: ste...@bajic.ch, dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM Statistics
> Hello,
>
> dspam_stats -H gan...@zxltexm.xxx
> gan...@zalteam.com:
>
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:21:32 +0200
> Von: salson.uma...@monecam.com
> An: john_esp...@yahoo.com, dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM Statistics
> My data is : opt/dspam/var/dspam
>
>
>
> ls
>
> data default.prefs dsp
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: "Alex BATKO"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-user] legitimate sender (thetyee.ca) marked as spammer
> Hi.
>
Hello,
> I subscribed to weekly news headlines from The Tyee (http://t
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:38:07 +
> Von: "Kārlis Repsons"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] TrainPristine on + spamassassin/dspam headers
> On Saturday 13 February 2010 21:39:51 Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Feb 20
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:32:30 +
> Von: "Kārlis Repsons"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Purges questions
> On Saturday 13 February 2010 21:45:15 Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:19:46 +
> >
> > Kā
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:00:57 +0100
> Von: Gabri Mate
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-user] signature in header not found in mysql
> Dear List,
>
> I've set up dspam 3.9.0 to use virtual users with postfix and put the
> signatur
research and implement it
when possible. So I am always reading those new researches and I am constantly
trying out new things. My Policyd-Weight is my heuristic wall that blocks and
DSPAM is my statistical classifier that has almost nothing to do because of the
small, fast and lean heuristic in fro
to add/remove/modify tokens for [merged group] then you need to
train that group separately. Training that merged group however will result in
indirect training for all merged group members.
> Thanks in advance
>
Steve
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozi
eas but if it were an option to
> send the messages to syslog the the administrator could configure syslog
> to send them where desired.
>
You should look at "TrackSources" in dspam.conf. That's what you want and not
system.log (which is btw just a journal).
> chee
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6269
That is the problem with those human written rules for Anti-Spam engines.
I wish a happy new year for all the DSPAM users out there.
// Steve
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http
> Agree. I just upload more complete and to HTML entities converted files.
> > Conversion was done with recode program:
> > for i in *.html *.pl; do recode --diacritics u8..HTML <$i>C/$i; done
> >
> > result seems be OK.
> >
> >
>
>
> Niiice.
&g
;
> Is beta4 really such confident about its classification?
>
If you have used OSB for PValue then it's a bug. The whole OSB thing for PValue
is removed from GIT since it needs a major overwork. So please go back to
something other the OSB for PValue. Take something like "
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:17:45 +0100 (CET)
> Von: Nicolas Vilz
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Nicolas Vilz
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Configuration Problem DeliveryHost
> On Mon, 30 Nov
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:47:03 +0100 (CET)
> Von: Nicolas Vilz
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Configuration Problem DeliveryHost
> > Original-Nachricht
> > >
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:47:03 +0100 (CET)
> Von: Nicolas Vilz
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Configuration Problem DeliveryHost
> > Original-Nachricht
> > >
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> Von: Nicolas Vilz
> An: Steve
> CC: Nicolas Vilz , dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Configuration Problem DeliveryHost
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Steve wrote:
&
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:33:56 -0500
> Von: Roman Gelfand
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM Header Message
> Hi Steve,
>
Hallo Roman,
> Just wanted to confirm you had received
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:09:33 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam 3.9.0b4 Segmentation Fault
> I found a notice in README about msgtags...
>
>
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:14:46 -0500
> Von: Roman Gelfand
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-user] DSPAM Header Message
> I have a dmz setup where postfix/dspam gateway mailserver is in dmz
> network. In the internal netwrok, I am r
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:28:38 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam 3.9.0b4 Segmentation Fault
> Em Sex, 2009-11-27 às 18:26 +0100, Steve escreveu:
>
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:08:19 +
> Von: Paul Cockings
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam 3.9.0b4 Segmentation Fault
> Paul Cockings wrote:
> > Felipe Szczesny Rout wrote:
> >> At this point I need to inform you th
do you get that repetitively?
> I really wish to solve this and will appreciate any help or tip.
> I'm trying to get e-mail being processed when the error occurred.
>
That would be great if you could do that. Can you send the message in question
to this mailing list? Or if it is s
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:34:27 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] [Fwd: Re: can\'t remove address from whitelist]
> Migration to 3.9.0beta4 solved t
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:10:10 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
> Helo Steve,
>
Hallo Filipe,
> I finished the translation of web ui to brazilian portug
sends and receives email
> - Anything else running on the server:
>
>
>
> Gary M (from the "Help with the Deliver button"
> listing) is helping me, but we don't seem to find where the problem is...
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> Daniel
>
Steve
>
>
&g
tact before handing me out that sensitive data. I however can
assure you that I am not going to cheat on you.
Please contact Paul Cockings (paulcocki...@users.sourceforge.net) or Alexander
Prinsier (aphe...@users.sourceforge.net) if you really want to pay something
for the DSPAM communit
for Probability Value and is a value/configuration option used
in dspam.conf to allow the operator of DSPAM choose what to use for computing
probability values.
> Thank you in advance once again,
>
>
> coma
>
Steve
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Exp
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:08:59 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
>
> > I would not mind if you would translate the templates for the WebUI in
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:50:54 -0700
> Von: Remo Mattei
> An: Steve
> CC: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
> I am swapt lately but I could look into the Italian let me know
>
Please d
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:45:46 +0100
> Von: "Daniel Sánchez Pearson [Hacheté Diseños Web]"
>
> An: "Steve" , dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
> HI,
>
Hallo,
> If it
pus is
> incapable of taking Maildir
> }
> else
> {
> to /home/clonicoe/Maildir/
> }
>
> Anywhere I got wrong?
>
What do you have used in dspam.conf for QuarantineAgent? Maybe you could post
your whole dspam.conf?
> Thanks for your advices.
>
> Regard
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:53:22 -0200
> Von: "felipe szczesny rout"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-user] Web UI
>
> Hello Steve,
>
Hallo Filipe
>I almost finished the upgrade from 3.8.0 t
e and measure the time. Maybe
something like this here:
time for foo in {1..1000};do /home/vpopmail/bin/dspamdel.sh -d
${f...@domain.com;done
And then try one of my examples in a loop. I guess it should be faster. And
faster in that case automatically means more mail throughput for your system :)
&g
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:47:03 +0100 (CET)
> Von: Nicolas Vilz
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Configuration Problem DeliveryHost
> > Original-Nachricht
> > >
libmysql_drv.so
Tokenizer sbph
SBPH tokenizer IS NOT going to work the proper way with the MySQL driver.
>
> Regards,
> Gary.
>
Steve
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
--
he list able to understand (and respond)
French.
> Thank you Steve,
>
Don't thank me. The list is here for that purpose.
> coma
>
// Steve
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischa
you
have chained everything together? The stuff from master.cf is important, then
main.cf (how do you identify mailman domains), then your mm_cfg.py, then your
dspam.conf and last the output of "dspam --version".
> dspam has to pass all mail to dovecot except the mails to a special
&
rapidly ahead with the RPM package.
> Thanks,
> Nathanael
>
Steve
--
Preisknaller: GMX DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal
e are users
of DSPAM and we are here on our free time and are trying to help each other out.
> Coma
>
// Steve
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller un
Hallo Coma,
> Thank you! but don't feel guilty, i'm French and I haven't made a lot of
> effort to learn English, so i'm happy when you try to understand me =)
>
Tu peux m'écrire quand tu veux en français. Je suis Suisse Allemand et chacun
de nous appr
ur
language. I guess I would be terrible in your native language and you sure
would still try to help me if I would write in your native language (what is
that anyway?). We are here on the mailing list a bunch of people from all over
the world. It&#x
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:10:21 -0700
> Von: Remo Mattei
> An: Steve , dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam_clean --option raccomandations
> Yes that fixed that.
>
Great! Sono una bestia (senza coda) :)
Signature: 4aec1ed7121451046482014
> > Created: Sat Oct 31 00:00:00 2009
> >
> >
> Hi Remo,
>
Hallo Paul,
> I do not understand your question. Can you help me understand your
> problem, then I can help you.
>
it's staying always on the same signature and no
e.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=commit;h=e6a340d28e95014ad29bc1e2af5ca51f23508521
http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=commit;h=c430e5a4b0c961a7fdb0ad72ac4c730704ce806c
Either check out GIT and test again or use one of the SQL scripts for purging
or wait for the next
are misleading. I changed
them as well to reflect the by default selected options.
Is it okay for you? Let me know if I can help in any other way.
// Steve
>
>
> --
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporti
left it disabled
> by default.
>
>
> The review request is here so you can follow along if you want.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587
>
Another error on line 113:
%global POSTRESQL_DRIVER_STRING ''
That should be:
%global POSTGRESQL_DRI
left it disabled
> by default.
>
>
> The review request is here so you can follow along if you want.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587
>
And another one: On line 357 and 359 you forgot to remove ${real_version} and
replace it with %{version}
//
omedir}/sql-scripts/sqlite2_*
It should be (it's fixed in the SPEC I sent recently):
%attr(0644,root,root) %config(noreplace) %{dspam_homedir}/sql-scripts/sqlite_*
// Steve
>
>
> --
> Let Crystal Repor
PAM then you could deliver over LMTP/SMTP to DSPAM while you deliver to
Procmail always over a pipe (if I am not wrong).
> Thanx in advance and continue to do your great work!!!
>
>
Steve
>
inside DSPAM use Perl. Such
a tool is for example dspam_train.
Just out of curiosity: When I made that SPEC file I wanted to be as flexible as
possible. I see now that some stuff is removed from the SPEC file (for example
using variables for Name, Version, etc). Is this something that th
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:05:31 -0700
> Von: "Nathanael D. Noblet"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] RPM/SPEC for DSPAM 3.9.0 BETA4
> On 11/14/2009 10:58 AM, Steve wrote:
> > Origina
nd in the
contrib directory. I don't know if it is in BETA4 but it's sure in GIT. The
logrotate file and init.d script are nothing fancy. I am attaching you the
version I used to compile DSPAM 3.9.0 BETA4 into this mail.
// Steve
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 un
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:55:40 +0100
> Von: "Steve"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-user] RPM/SPEC for DSPAM 3.9.0 BETA4
> Hallo all,
>
> I modified my old SPEC file I used for 3.8.0 to build DSPA
h large_domain
--with user_homedirs
--with virtual_users
--with syslog
Not enabling them when building automatically disables that feature. Does any
one see another thing that should be added as an option?
// Steve
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten un
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:18:49 +
> Von: Paul Cockings
> An: "Nathanael D. Noblet"
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam delivery failures...
> Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> >
> >> I have found a older version of the
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:54:16 -0700
> Von: "Nathanael D. Noblet"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam delivery failures...
> On 11/13/2009 04:35 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> > And more
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:18:50 -0700
> Von: "Nathanael D. Noblet"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Dspam delivery failures...
> On 11/13/2009 04:08 PM, Steve wrote:
> > http://www.itil
1 - 100 of 391 matches
Mail list logo
