l single repeater FM nets.
Ed WA4YIH
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 3:55 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll.
On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Wo
On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
>
> and the audio is much better than FM equivalents of IRLP and EchoLink.
>
>
> Ed WA4YIH
Not technically possible unless the repeaters are interfaced incorrectly.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
n...@natetech.com
nk.
Ed WA4YIH
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of john_ke5c
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 6:53 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll.
After considerable experience on D-Star nets, both via dplus links a
At 07:52 AM 4/4/2010, you wrote:
>After considerable experience on D-Star nets, both via dplus links
>and Icom's multiplex facility, and in callsign routed QSO's, I am of
>the distinct opinion that D-Star communciations are fairly
>unreliable. Dropped streams are frequent. Folks double on each
> I agree. Each situation is so vastly different that no one can say
> with any certainty a mode will out preform another. We need all
> of the ammunition that we can have at our disposal.
> Emergency communications is NOT a contest or competition between
> modes.
> Its what we do, not with what we
