Re: [dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds

2008-07-15 Thread Ron Wright
. I have never been more impressed by another HT, DStar or analog. Just a very finneee HT. 73, ron, n9ee/r >From: Ronald Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 2008/07/14 Mon PM 10:21:11 EDT >To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds &g

Re: [dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds

2008-07-15 Thread Nate Duehr
To add to the other's comments: The IC-91AD seems to run hotter for most folks than the IC-92AD with the larger battery pack (heat sink). The joke is running around that there's soon to be an Icom oven mitt, as an official option, that can be purchased for use with the IC-91AD. However, I've

RE: [dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds

2008-07-14 Thread Woodrick, Ed
The 92 is waterproof, has slightly better labeled keys, and supports the GPS mike. I believe that it also supports the GPS location screen.

Re: [dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds

2008-07-14 Thread Chris Hasley
Ron, I have the 92AD (never used the 91AD)... you'll have 4 power settings (super low, low, medium, and high) compared to the two settings on the 91AD - this was a plus for me as I like the medium settings. Also, small advantage, but the radio feels solid in your hand... I have large hands and

[dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds

2008-07-14 Thread Ronald Nutter
I am thinking about getting one of the above mentioned handhelds. Other than cost, I would like to know what is thought of the two radios and benefits of one versus the other. Thanks, Ron KA4KYI