Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Dec 2009 QST p 50 - SSB vs. AM

2009-12-20 Thread Gary Pearce KN4AQ
At 05:45 AM 12/20/2009, Nate Duehr wrote: On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Gary Pearce KN4AQ wrote: > In doing a little research, I learned that SSB was originally created for long distance telephone use, for things like the Atlantic cable as Adam notes, in the early 1930's. It first appeared in

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Dec 2009 QST p 50 - SSB vs. AM

2009-12-20 Thread Nate Duehr
On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Gary Pearce KN4AQ wrote: > In doing a little research, I learned that SSB was originally created for > long distance telephone use, for things like the Atlantic cable as Adam > notes, in the early 1930's. It first appeared in Amateur Radio experimentally > in 1947

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Dec 2009 QST p 50 - SSB vs. AM

2009-12-19 Thread Gary Pearce KN4AQ
Thanks for the plug, Steve! QST seems to like my no-so-cookie-cutter reviews. Hopefully you all do, too. The 880 review starts off with a very brief mention of the transition from AM to SSB. That took place in Amateur Radio beginning around 1949 (the year I was born), and was still in proces

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Dec 2009 QST p 50 - SSB vs. AM

2009-12-19 Thread Adam Farson
Hi Steve, I am not 100% sure about the dates cited, but where was the heresy? The 9 dB power advantage of SSB over AM, and the 50% reduction in occupied bandwidth when using SSB, are indisputable (at least from my perspective). Germany had a working public SSB radio-telephone link between New Y